Posted by Someone on November 26, 2000 at 22:19:03:
In Reply to: I partially disagree posted by Feirshay on November 26, 2000 at 21:37:58:
There's nothign wrong with originality, but there *is* something wrong with playing 'good' and acting neutral. If you're going to do that, get switched neut at level 1(if it's the basic premise of the charecter) > I got off lighter than I should have? Having no
> I really don't understand the necessity of forcing
> shamans to be evil or good aligned. With my role, it
> was much more plausible to play the angry shaman that
> killed anything in the way.
> communes for two weeks and eating deaths from pissed
> off players isn't enough? The last thing CF needs is
> tougher penalties for attempting a new character idea
> that ignores the standard. Yeah, let's just trash
> characters that don't follow the imms' ideals.