I partially disagree

I partially disagree:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Feirshay on November 26, 2000 at 21:37:58:

In Reply to: I feel the need to comment on that: posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on November 26, 2000 at 21:10:57:

I really don't understand the necessity of forcing
shamans to be evil or good aligned. With my role, it
was much more plausible to play the angry shaman that
killed anything in the way.

I got off lighter than I should have? Having no
communes for two weeks and eating deaths from pissed
off players isn't enough? The last thing CF needs is
tougher penalties for attempting a new character idea
that ignores the standard. Yeah, let's just trash
characters that don't follow the imms' ideals.

Follow Ups:

standard shok comments within. shokai 03:38:22 11/27/2000 (2)
- Could you explain one thing ? Swist 16:07:17 11/27/2000 (1)
  - hrm. Shokai 18:53:33 11/27/2000 (0)
How to miss the side of a barn with a blunderbuss... Graham 02:30:55 11/27/2000 (0)
Re: I partially disagree Someone 22:19:03 11/26/2000 (0)
Hrm... Devil's Advocate 21:48:19 11/26/2000 (1)
- It's not like your opinion matters any, but, where in this thread did I toot my little horn about how good a roleplayer I am? Feirshay 22:07:36 11/26/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> I really don't understand the necessity of forcing > shamans to be evil or good aligned. With my role, it > was much more plausible to play the angry shaman that > killed anything in the way. > I got off lighter than I should have? Having no > communes for two weeks and eating deaths from pissed > off players isn't enough? The last thing CF needs is > tougher penalties for attempting a new character idea > that ignores the standard. Yeah, let's just trash > characters that don't follow the imms' ideals.