Re: Sanctification...:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Healer on December 11, 2000 at 09:33:35:

In Reply to: Sanctification... posted by The Arcane(VIP) on December 11, 2000 at 00:50:50:

> ...is a traditionally "good" act. The power to negate that which is unholy, and to make it holy, it pretty much a "gods of Light" thing, rather than something an evil deity would let their follower do.

I agree that sanctification is traditionally "good", but evil healers can cast sanc too.

> I could make an argument for neutral healers being able to commune it, though.

> And I wonder if it'd be too unbalancing to allow evil healers to *make* rooms norecall for a period of time. Would put an interesting twist on an evil healer's role in certain situations, for sure.

I like this idea, since sanc is good, evil should have an opposite commune.

> But now I'm rambling, so I'll stop.

As will I


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]