Sanctification...

Sanctification...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by The Arcane(VIP) on December 11, 2000 at 00:50:50:

In Reply to: I still fail to understand (text) posted by Healer on December 10, 2000 at 20:54:03:

...is a traditionally "good" act. The power to negate that which is unholy, and to make it holy, it pretty much a "gods of Light" thing, rather than something an evil deity would let their follower do.

I could make an argument for neutral healers being able to commune it, though.

And I wonder if it'd be too unbalancing to allow evil healers to *make* rooms norecall for a period of time. Would put an interesting twist on an evil healer's role in certain situations, for sure.

But now I'm rambling, so I'll stop.

Follow Ups:

Re: Sanctification... Healer 09:33:35 12/11/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> ...is a traditionally "good" act. The power to negate that which is unholy, and to make it holy, it pretty much a "gods of Light" thing, rather than something an evil deity would let their follower do. > I could make an argument for neutral healers being able to commune it, though. > And I wonder if it'd be too unbalancing to allow evil healers to make rooms norecall for a period of time. Would put an interesting twist on an evil healer's role in certain situations, for sure. > But now I'm rambling, so I'll stop.