I still fail to understand (text)

I still fail to understand (text):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Healer on December 10, 2000 at 20:54:03:

In Reply to: Evil or Neutral Healers have no reason to want to remove a no-recall "curse", or prevent people from being summoned . nt posted by Death_Claw on December 10, 2000 at 20:34:45:

This supplication attempts to sanctify the room the healer is in, removing the cursed aura that prevents recall. In addition, a sanctified room prevents transport by other magical means, such as gate or summon. -CF helpfile

Now, why wouldn't a neutral or evil healer want to get rid of a curse that prevented recall? If you're stuck somewhere, and can't recall, why does it matter if you're good or not? You still want to get out. Why wouldn't an evil healer want his groupmate/cabalmate/etc. prevented from being summoned? I'm just wondering, as this is a question I've thought about since they split up clerics.

Follow Ups:

Sanctification... The Arcane(VIP) 00:50:50 12/11/2000 (1)
- Re: Sanctification... Healer 09:33:35 12/11/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> This supplication attempts to sanctify the room the healer is in, removing the cursed aura that prevents recall. In addition, a sanctified room prevents transport by other magical means, such as gate or summon. -CF helpfile > > Now, why wouldn't a neutral or evil healer want to get rid of a curse that prevented recall? If you're stuck somewhere, and can't recall, why does it matter if you're good or not? You still want to get out. Why wouldn't an evil healer want his groupmate/cabalmate/etc. prevented from being summoned? I'm just wondering, as this is a question I've thought about since they split up clerics.