Evil or Neutral Healers have no reason to want to remove a no-recall "curse", or prevent people from being summoned . nt

Evil or Neutral Healers have no reason to want to remove a no-recall "curse", or prevent people from being summoned . nt:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Death_Claw on December 10, 2000 at 20:34:45:

In Reply to: Could you elaborate? n/t posted by Healer on December 10, 2000 at 19:33:09:

> > > As things stand, and how they've always stood is good healers get sanctify room and benefits from protection, while evil healers don't get sanc room, but still benefit from protection, and neutral healers don't get either. Now, as a neutral healer I understand not benefitting from protection, as there are benefits from being neutral that you don't get from a polarized alignment, but why is sanctify room a good-only commune? Why can't evils, or even neutrals do it?

Follow Ups:

I still fail to understand (text) Healer 20:54:03 12/10/2000 (2)
- Sanctification... The Arcane(VIP) 00:50:50 12/11/2000 (1)
  - Re: Sanctification... Healer 09:33:35 12/11/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > As things stand, and how they've always stood is good healers get sanctify room and benefits from protection, while evil healers don't get sanc room, but still benefit from protection, and neutral healers don't get either. Now, as a neutral healer I understand not benefitting from protection, as there are benefits from being neutral that you don't get from a polarized alignment, but why is sanctify room a good-only commune? Why can't evils, or even neutrals do it?