Could you elaborate? n/t

Could you elaborate? n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Healer on December 10, 2000 at 19:33:09:

In Reply to: Roleplay reasons N/t posted by Arolin on December 10, 2000 at 19:24:17:

> > As things stand, and how they've always stood is good healers get sanctify room and benefits from protection, while evil healers don't get sanc room, but still benefit from protection, and neutral healers don't get either. Now, as a neutral healer I understand not benefitting from protection, as there are benefits from being neutral that you don't get from a polarized alignment, but why is sanctify room a good-only commune? Why can't evils, or even neutrals do it?

Follow Ups:

Evil or Neutral Healers have no reason to want to remove a no-recall "curse", or prevent people from being summoned . nt Death_Claw 20:34:45 12/10/2000 (3)
- I still fail to understand (text) Healer 20:54:03 12/10/2000 (2)
  - Sanctification... The Arcane(VIP) 00:50:50 12/11/2000 (1)
    - Re: Sanctification... Healer 09:33:35 12/11/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > As things stand, and how they've always stood is good healers get sanctify room and benefits from protection, while evil healers don't get sanc room, but still benefit from protection, and neutral healers don't get either. Now, as a neutral healer I understand not benefitting from protection, as there are benefits from being neutral that you don't get from a polarized alignment, but why is sanctify room a good-only commune? Why can't evils, or even neutrals do it?