I've said it before, and I'll say it again (this time in easy-to-understand language, painstakingly constructed so as not to confuse anyone)

I've said it before, and I'll say it again (this time in easy-to-understand language, painstakingly constructed so as not to confuse anyone):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Macheath on March 30, 2000 at 14:53:39:

In Reply to: A fairly simple fight (Rager rant inside) posted by Mithadris on March 30, 2000 at 13:36:06:

Battleragers are not Knights.

The only reason a Rager might adhere to honorable one-on-one combat, aside from personal reasons (read: sphere Honor), is that they simply don't feel that more than one person is necessary most of the time. It's generally accepted that more than one person on Zorszaul is A-OK, as far as I can tell, and "parity" (whatever the hell THAT is) goes right out the window during a raid. Why you would complain about one rager attacking you, and another that was already looking for you thirsting in a moment later - ESPECIALLY when one of them realizes the mistake and flees - is beyond me.

Well, no, I guess it's not beyond me. You died, you're feeling bitchy.

Follow Ups:

Dhaevor wouldn't induct me when I said that I would help gangbang a mage. (n/t) Chalupah 19:15:57 3/30/2000 (0)
Just a quick question I though that ragers never gangbang aginst there rules? Anti rager 17:03:10 3/30/2000 (0)
quick reply to Macheath Mithadris 15:02:34 3/30/2000 (0)
And Furthermore... Macheath 15:01:26 3/30/2000 (11)
- And furthermore... you're talking out your ass. Maniakes 15:10:37 3/30/2000 (10)
  - Um... Macheath 15:14:21 3/30/2000 (9)
    - Like I said, you're talking out your ass. Maniakes 15:21:52 3/30/2000 (8)
      - Bah. Macheath 15:29:52 3/30/2000 (7)
        
        You're Right. He's Wrong. Let Him Think He's Right If It Makes Him Happy. (n/t) Uhm 20:42:26 3/30/2000 (0)
        
        Two on one, yeah your chance for living is 100%, but IF you fight one on one the odds go down, so you are a coward (no courage) to fight two on one, do you get it now Macheath? Think n/t Me 20:20:17 3/30/2000 (2)
        
        Predicate Logic droolcup 21:21:27 3/30/2000 (0)
        
        Um... Kinslayer 20:40:06 3/30/2000 (0)
        
        You don't seem to understand. Maniakes 16:40:37 3/30/2000 (0)
        
        Courage is only courage when it's done for its own sake Polemachus 16:20:37 3/30/2000 (1)
        
        Yeah But Thooble tried to apply this. Dhaevor missed it completely. Baroman seemed to have caught on. N/T Thooble 21:28:47 3/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Battleragers are not Knights. > > The <b><i>only</b></i> reason a Rager might adhere to honorable one-on-one combat, aside from personal reasons (read: sphere Honor), is that they simply don't feel that more than one person is necessary most of the time. It's generally accepted that more than one person on Zorszaul is A-OK, as far as I can tell, and "parity" (whatever the hell THAT is) goes right out the window during a raid. Why you would complain about one rager attacking you, and another that was already looking for you thirsting in a moment later - ESPECIALLY when one of them realizes the mistake and flees - is beyond me. > > Well, no, I guess it's not beyond me. You died, you're feeling bitchy.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]