Posted by Grallon on June 2, 2000 at 11:03:28:

In Reply to: That's probably what he was talking about. For Imbrogno it's harm or fatigue and this was just one of those times that I chose the latter, even though cloud giants don't take harm so well. nt posted by Imbrogno on June 2, 2000 at 10:51:56:

> > > > > Well fought, I wonder though... why did you fatigue instead of demonfire? Just a matter of practice?

Follow Ups:

• Three reasons Imbrogno 12:00:56 6/2/2000 (27)
  • Though cloud giant con is good, Rager con is often lower, especially for an old vet like Ioanis. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 12:07:45 6/2/2000 (26)
    • Rot (woulda been n/t, but too long) Khiravn 15:49:54 6/2/2000 (23)
      • Re: Rot (woulda been n/t, but too long) Cheap Tactic? 18:02:32 6/2/2000 (16)
        • His point... or possibly one of them Saerin 08:16:59 6/3/2000 (15)
          • Khiravn's worst enemy was a shaman who he fought constantly. It's not like one wither did that. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 09:56:40 6/3/2000 (0)
          • Rot is also incredibly easy to combat. nt Imbrogno 08:42:21 6/3/2000 (10)
            • No it isn't. There are ways, but it depends on who you are. A rager with depleted con is in big trouble. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 09:49:41 6/3/2000 (9)
              • Yes it is Imbrogno 11:11:57 6/3/2000 (8)
                • I love when people say things like "Just get two rings of fortitude". (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 12:11:49 6/3/2000 (7)
                  • Fine, don't wanna do fortitudes... Imbrogno 12:23:41 6/3/2000 (6)
                    • Look: Khiravn 12:40:45 6/3/2000 (5)
                      • my opinion, not that you asked for one Nepenthe(IMM) 14:50:48 6/3/2000 (3)
                        • Heh Imbrogno 14:53:51 6/3/2000 (2)
                          • Re: Heh Nepenthe(IMM) 15:03:42 6/3/2000 (1)
                            • I tell you what, I'll trade cause light/serious/critical and demonfire for magic missile. nt Imbrogno 15:47:03 6/3/2000 (0)
                      • Looking at all of the facts can be fun too Imbrogno 13:21:09 6/3/2000 (0)
          • Get your info straight. Wither decreases lifespan in hours. Rot does not. *smack* n/t Uhhhmmmm 08:24:35 6/3/2000 (2)
            • My other point still stands. It's weak to rot someone and run off. Clear enough? (n/t) Saerin 08:51:27 6/3/2000 (1)
              • I think I'd rather have them run off, that way I can run some place safe and be sure to get my gear back at the very least. NT Smirk 09:07:30 6/3/2000 (0)
      • Don't you dare think for a moment that Arlian wouldn't flee/sleep/fiend me in a heartbeat. nt Imbrogno 16:04:44 6/2/2000 (5)
        • Only in your mind does flee/fiend equate to rot/recall. The only purpose of the 2nd is to easily con kill someone. n/t Khiravn 17:14:35 6/2/2000 (4)
          • One word: Power Word Kill. Game, Set, Match. nt Grallon 11:07:26 6/7/2000 (0)
          • and to me that's a beautiful thing. I hate ragers ooc and ic. nt Imbrogno 17:51:39 6/2/2000 (2)
            • Reality check. Forum Reader 08:18:28 6/3/2000 (0)
            • finally: Leradok 03:41:01 6/3/2000 (0)
    • All very true, but from this side of the fence it seems like con quests are handed out like candy. Though I know that isn't the case, it seems that way :) nt Imbrogno 12:10:58 6/2/2000 (1)
      • Or to put it more simply, and in a less inflammatory fashion, it's smart not to make assumptions about the con of ragers. nt Imbrogno 12:13:28 6/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup