fuzzy response, the Imms don't RP

fuzzy response, the Imms don't RP:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by SphereMaker(IMM) on August 6, 2000 at 10:18:10:

In Reply to: though I should add the player in question also has the star quality of a log. [fuzzy text] posted by FBG on August 6, 2000 at 05:33:19:

I find it hard to believe that if the bells and whistles were attached, these complaints wouldn't still be here. But I have two comments about it anyway. First, I don't know that much RP interaction is needed in something like this. You break the Code, your powers go away. Would I handle it that way? Probably not; but that's a matter of taste not protocol. Second, since we don't know who the immortal doing the unempowering is, how do we know it isn't role-played?

Anyway, it's really not worth arguing about. Just a comment.

Follow Ups:

I think it's worth laying out in a neat pattern. FBG (getting down to business) 16:37:22 8/6/2000 (6)
- WOW!! You nailed it on the head. ALL IMMORTALS should read this. n/t *ORB* 12:24:46 8/8/2000 (0)
- Re: I think it's worth laying out in a neat pattern. Cat 12:43:41 8/7/2000 (3)
  - not too hard... FBG 13:14:30 8/7/2000 (2)
    - Re: not too hard... Cat 13:22:46 8/7/2000 (1)
      - Re: not too hard...(Rp should have been used for The descision of un-empowerment, as well as The actualy unempowering. not-so-pissed player 21:26:10 8/7/2000 (0)
- Re: I think it's worth laying out in a neat pattern. pissed player 19:08:19 8/6/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I find it hard to believe that if the bells and whistles were attached, these complaints wouldn't still be here. But I have two comments about it anyway. First, I don't know that much RP interaction is needed in something like this. You break the Code, your powers go away. Would I handle it that way? Probably not; but that's a matter of taste not protocol. Second, since we don't know who the immortal doing the unempowering is, how do we know it <i>isn't</i> role-played? > > Anyway, it's really not worth arguing about. Just a comment.