Posted by Alusair on December 8, 2000 at 11:21:25:

In Reply to: This is for you Alusair. Ass. Now shut up and stop whining. as you can see, there was no looting of the pit involved. posted by Hammon on December 8, 2000 at 09:43:59:

Here is the point, yes I am wrong about it being from the pit
however, you said that it came from the wanted person, so
you taking the stuff with your guard is ok. Now there is no
way that Tastagro was using a hammer of the Nephilim, and looting
anything from a cabal, using your guard is an abuse of your power
as an arbiter, because using the guard to take things is you acting
as an arbiter, not the whiny youngling ap you are. If you had come
in and taken them yourself I would have no problem with it, but because
you do it with your guards you are making a conflict between arbiter
and battle, because that is an act of war. There were all kinds of
messed up things in that fight like Grettial disobeying a direct order
a nicely timed raid by master coinciding with me turning myself in, which
we all know you sulk about the tower day and night, and a bull *** flag
that ended up getting removed because grettial had no leg to stand on with
giving it. With Khartos and kelbecso, and god knows who else, it is
obvious that many arbiters have a problem with battle, that is fine, but
when your an arbiter be an arbiter, you can't come to battle with the
fight and insults and not expect war. and you hurling insults left and right
is a perfect example of you not being able to argue your stand point.
and while we're touching on the subject of bull *** flags, the time you
had witnesses in TV against a villager, I'm sure the witnesses you had were
at least tower related, even if they weren't master, because in reality that
attack never happened.

Follow Ups:

• No, the point is... Hammon 21:39:06 12/8/2000 (7)
  • If this post is not offensive, it is also not tasteful or very intelligent Aluria 23:03:08 12/10/2000 (4)
    • Re: If this post is not offensive, it is also not tasteful or very intelligent Hammon 00:55:04 12/11/2000 (3)
      • No, your profanity was excessive, not incidental, and it detracts from your credability/nt Aluria 05:06:38 12/11/2000 (2)
        • Not really, since noone has been able to refute a single one of my points as far as Alusair being an utter moron goes. Hammon 23:24:42 12/12/2000 (1)
          • He doesn't have to. You never prove he IS an idiot, only that you are about as insightful as graatch/nt Aluria 10:50:30 12/14/2000 (0)
  • In response... BTW, you truely are a moron.... Tastagro 21:05:22 12/10/2000 (1)
    • Re: In response... BTW, you truely are a moron.... Hammon 01:44:16 12/11/2000 (0)
• just as a side note, I have nothing against you, but there have been more than a few corrupted arbiters in the recent past n/t Alusair 11:33:26 12/8/2000 (0)

Post a Followup