Posted by Daryl(VIP) on February 28, 2000 at 06:53:17:

In Reply to: Well fought: Request: posted by Etherian on February 28, 2000 at 05:39:33:

Isn't holy word a "harmful area-type affect" therefore, being against the law? Its not harmful to everyone, just evils in your battle range. Any opinions here?

Follow Ups:

• Question: Is 'cold be sleep' considered an aggressive act by Arbiter Law? (n/t) Proud Blade 09:45:55 2/28/2000 (6)
  • Yes Arbiter Elder 09:56:10 2/28/2000 (5)
    • Except... Truzenzuzex 11:56:44 2/28/2000 (0)
    • By that logic, why wasn't Golmagus expelled for using horror to drive people out of protected areas? (n/t) Proud Blade 10:13:40 2/28/2000 (3)
      • Because Golmagus was an imm. n/t Newsboy 16:17:02 2/28/2000 (1)
        • Dunno if that's all there is to it: Khiravn 17:48:05 2/28/2000 (0)
      • Like I said, judgement call, since nothings in stone. n/t Arbiter Elder 10:18:01 2/28/2000 (0)
• According to the pillar, Area effects are illegal, no one has to be harmed by them. n/t Ex-Arbiter Lord 09:44:12 2/28/2000 (0)
• Yes, it is. Had another non-wanted evil been there, Etherian would have been in some sh*t. As he should have been anyways. Arbiter Elder 07:09:24 2/28/2000 (1)
  • Etherian should be flag as all of does who casta area spells, even if they seem no agresive like a bards sleep song, (have been flag for those(even when noone in range was there)) NT Etherian, You s***as an arbiter! 08:40:15 2/28/2000 (0)

Post a Followup