Sounds very fair to me! Would probably lead to making the immortal job easier since there would be less complaints of cheating for the immortals to handle about level 15s going around with 40 dam rolls. n/t:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Someone on February 9, 2000 at 11:52:23:

In Reply to: Rules posted by Rome on February 9, 2000 at 11:08:25:

>
> > There are other reasons, but this is the most
> > concrete one... You can't tell who should be
> > "allowed" to loot in a given combat.

> Seeing as how the rules state that you are not allowed to cause the death of another player if they are out side of your pk, it would seem to me fairly clear who should be allowed to loot.

> In even the largest of battles, if you are outside of the dead persons pk-range, you, by rule, should not have influenced their death.

> The only exception to this rule would seem to be in the case of arbiters, as their influence is allowed to extend to those outside of their pk-range. (This could by-pass the pk-only looting restriction by having guards auto-loot players they kill).

> Fair enough?

> ...Rome...

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]