Re: Sainthood

Re: Sainthood:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by An Old Arbiter on March 27, 2000 at 17:45:28:

In Reply to: Re: Sainthood posted by SphereMaker(IMM) on March 27, 2000 at 17:34:21:

>
> > Anyway, I think this would work well. It’s completely different than the lich,
>
> Um, no it's not.
>
> You guys really should give up this "transformation into saints/angels" stuff, cuz it just ain't gonna happen.

Why not? Why should evil have the only uber-class?

Yes, goodies shouldn't have a carbon-copy class of a Lich, but Liches are ridiculously powerful, requiring huge groups of very experienced players to kill.

Even then, they have a skill which requires them to regain lost constitution that they can acquire and phylactries that can counter-balance most, if not all, of their vulnerabilities.

Just a thought, not a complaint.

Follow Ups:

don't rock the boat, baby SphereMaker(IMM) 17:53:34 3/27/2000 (2)
- No offense, but... someone special 18:26:34 3/27/2000 (1)
  - Re: No offense, but you have no fucking clue what you're talking about (text) Sarcastic Bob 20:29:58 3/27/2000 (0)
don't rock the boat, baby SphereMaker(IMM) 17:53:01 3/27/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > > Anyway, I think this would work well. It’s completely different than the lich, > > > > Um, no it's not. > > > > You guys really should give up this "transformation into saints/angels" stuff, cuz it just ain't gonna happen. > > Why not? Why should evil have the only uber-class? > > Yes, goodies shouldn't have a carbon-copy class of a Lich, but Liches are ridiculously powerful, requiring huge groups of very experienced players to kill. > > Even then, they have a skill which requires them to regain lost constitution that they can acquire and phylactries that can counter-balance most, if not all, of their vulnerabilities. > > Just a thought, not a complaint.