Posted by Me on April 5, 2000 at 02:06:31:

Maybe I'm way out in left field here, but I think that
the new battle rager policy allowing only Defenders is
pretty much bullshit. What is the purpose behind this?
I can think of a few reasons, all of which are crap.
1. Dhaevor thinks that Berserkers are not efficient at
stopping magic. (The most obvious) In which case,
he should not have been a berserker.
2. Dhaevor thinks that Berserkers are not good to the
over all well being of the village. It is bullshit
that he wants other people to not be berserkers, when
he is. Although I'm a big Sylvan fan, I disagreed when
Sylvan said they wouldn't allow shamans any more,
when 2 of the 3 leaders were Shamans.
3. If I was Dhaevor, I'd want lots of Defenders running
around to heal me up. It adds to his strength.
4. If they were in Empire, this would be an awsome move,
as a leader, to stop all threats to you. (We all know

Follow Ups:

• Well, you have no idea then. Someone 02:55:30 4/5/2000 (2)
  • PS... Someone 03:00:39 4/5/2000 (1)
    • For you calling me uninformed, you didn't address a single one of my points in the least, you went off on a completely different tangent Although I am not uninformed, you are an idiot n/t Me 15:41:58 4/5/2000 (0)
• my problem rager applicant 02:34:26 4/5/2000 (0)
• Messed up a bit, I'll finish my opinion on Battles new bullshit policy Me again 02:13:49 4/5/2000 (0)

Post a Followup