Posted by Pendragon_Surtr on May 16, 2000 at 22:21:33:
In Reply to: answer posted by Grallon on May 16, 2000 at 10:24:33:
> disarm through str loss, usually takes off the offhand sword. And you can flurry with a sword in your main hand(may be wrong, but I think you only hit once...or a drastically lowered amount of times)
>
> Disarm through disarm, however, leaves you with a sword in your offhand and nothing in your main hand...and no specs can be done from the offhand.
>
> FTA
>
>
>
>
> > Now something struck me as odd while reading the log board. In a fight I myself had I boneshattered a warrior which caused him to lose his dual sword. The very next round he flurries (I can post the log later). I figured it was something that could just be done since certain spirits can flurry using one sword. But then I saw this log:
> >
> > Ioanis vs Muskul
> >
> > 630hp 366m 741mv flurry
> > 630hp 366m 741mv You must dual wield two swords to flurry.
> > Muskul has some small but disgusting cuts
> >
> >
> > And then this one:
> >
> > Minaclar vs Aradan
> >
> > "Oh. Also. He was withered and lost his Armageddon.
> > Yeow."
> >
> > Someone starts a vicious series of attacks with its swords.
> > You manage to partially parry its attack, but are still hit
> >
> >
> > So which is suppose to be right? Can you flurry with only one sword? Is the part in Ioanis' log just a typo/bug or what? Thanks.