Just wondering: warrior classes vs. magic users

Just wondering: warrior classes vs. magic users:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Uli on September 26, 2000 at 12:03:46:

Did you notice that very few players play the same amount
of warrior classes as they play mage classes. Most people
choose only one of these options. I was just wondering why.

Here is my own answer: I prefer mages. The reasons are:

1. I just can't play without word of recall and teleport.
2. I think (just personal opinion) that reequipping with
a warrior on low ranks (<30) is much more difficult.
Naked warrior is worthless, though even naked mage contributes
to his group approximately the same bonuses as a mage in
most shiny eq.

Follow Ups:

Re: Just wondering: warrior classes vs. magic users Grizzled Old Bear 13:39:07 9/26/2000 (2)
- Or you judge a lvl 47 naked mage or a lvl 47 naked dual specialized warrior. I'll take the mage. NT Beladorizid 14:42:29 9/26/2000 (1)
  - Re: Of course you would so would I a warrior gets his last skill depending on specialization. Mages get more spells and some skill well into their 40's NT Grizzled Old Bear 14:58:28 9/26/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Did you notice that very few players play the same amount > of warrior classes as they play mage classes. Most people > choose only one of these options. I was just wondering why. > Here is my own answer: I prefer mages. The reasons are: > 1. I just can't play without word of recall and teleport. > 2. I think (just personal opinion) that reequipping with > a warrior on low ranks (<30) is much more difficult. > Naked warrior is worthless, though even naked mage contributes > to his group approximately the same bonuses as a mage in > most shiny eq.