Posted by *blink* on October 1, 2000 at 12:01:30:

Follow Ups:

• Polearm could be interesting, I have seen a felar do well with it.. (small text) No one important..yet 13:11:02 10/1/2000 (0)
• Bad? at what? Is pink a colour or a state of mind... Graham 12:45:20 10/1/2000 (11)
  • Wow Mr. Cracker! I agree with you! (text) Zepachu 12:49:14 10/1/2000 (10)
    • as an aside i can think of more useful combos than sword/dagger both are tanking specs (in pk) Graham 13:02:19 10/1/2000 (9)
      • Since when was Dagger a tanking spec?! n/t TSM 13:20:26 10/1/2000 (8)
        • concealed. (nt) Magtograme 14:12:31 10/1/2000 (7)
          • Tanking spec = Makes you get hit less, or you wield weapons that naturally tank well (n/t) Joshu 14:52:48 10/1/2000 (6)
            • qualification Magtograme 15:22:43 10/1/2000 (5)
              • But.... Proud Blade(VIP) 16:28:58 10/1/2000 (4)
                • You can't DB concealed hits Abernyte 13:34:02 10/2/2000 (0)
                • you lose out some of the capability of both specs which could be better used with a more suitable alternate weapon spec, each to their own i expressed an opinion and know fine well what i meant by tanking spec. Graham 11:39:44 10/2/2000 (0)
                • Ah but Proud Blade... (text) Zepachu 16:57:34 10/1/2000 (1)
                  • TEXT Daishan(VIP) 00:59:04 10/2/2000 (0)
• I would suggest sword/dagger for drow. (n/t) Swist 12:41:47 10/1/2000 (0)
• the ONLY drawback is (nt) is polearm weight, but you can find a few light polearms 12:29:20 10/1/2000 (0)
• auto sneak plus underhand can't be too shabby. n/t Smithers 12:13:20 10/1/2000 (0)
• Not bad... that could be interesting and effective. (n.txt) Zepachu 12:04:23 10/1/2000 (2)
  • Or fail incredibly bad and be totally pissed cause you wasted your second spec. nt Drows are weak 12:36:04 10/1/2000 (1)
    • Basically. :-) But it COULD be interesting. (n.txt) Zepachu 12:39:58 10/1/2000 (0)

Post a Followup