Posted by Zepachu on November 18, 2000 at 10:20:31:
In Reply to: Scarabs have been/always will be the weakest cabal. nt posted by Newsboy on November 17, 2000 at 19:21:45:
Saying that "Scarab has always been and will always be the weakest cabal" is inaccurate. That argument is based solely on members in the cabal.
An Example:
Look at the Empire.
Look at Scarab.
Look at the skill level of their members.
Granted numbers make a difference, but so does skill. I happen to think Scarabites are "better" than most Imperials. Therefore I would rate the Empire (at most times) to be weaker than Scarab.
Just a stupid observation, not meant to berate you,
-Zepachu
> > What is the weakest cabal right now? I like to join
> > the weakest cabal generally and see if I can't make
> > them rock :). I also like evil characters because of
> > my propensity to player kill like mad and my complete
> > lack of desire to help out people who have no idea
> > whatsoever what they are doing. Imperials seem
> > damn weak to me, seeing as how I just killed four of
> > them today with my shitty explore character. Sylvans
> > seem strong, though since I'm not a hero yet it is
> > hard to tell. Arbiters are just weak
> > after playing one, same with entropy. They have no
> > real power, they are just fun to play. Masters exist
> > and seem to be doing alright, a nice even level with
> > ragers. Dawn are strong because empire is weak.
> > If these impressions are wrong, let me know...
> > Also, what is up with scarab? Are they a cabal?
> > Do they have actual powers? I almost got into that
> > cabal except then I lost time for the mud because
> > of school and deleted my evil ranger.