Fine, I await your answer in game.

Fine, I await your answer in game.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Xzortok on April 1, 2000 at 05:57:49:

In Reply to: I have a very good answer for you... posted by Dhaevor on April 1, 2000 at 04:57:38:

But I really do not see how you can justify how allowing a cabal to have mages in it.
If they support mages, they are protecting mages, they are helping mages. The simple reason that I can think of you do not enforce this is because you are afraid to fight every cabal in the game like Empire, which kinda goes against the whole courage thing. I could be wrong but it is time battle stop having your cake and eating it too.

Follow Ups:

Stop your fucking whining you uninformed bitch. n/t Newsboy 06:26:58 4/1/2000 (17)
- So eloquent, Graatch. (n/t) Proud Blade 08:39:34 4/1/2000 (4)
  - Get a fucking clue, Proud Blade, and next time try to have a brain. Newsboy is not, nor ever has been, me. n/t Graatch(VIP) 15:55:55 4/1/2000 (3)
    - Stupider..hehe n/t DL 06:02:37 4/2/2000 (1)
      - My error. As Graatch would say, I am indeed more stupider. (n/t) Proud Blade 10:14:12 4/2/2000 (0)
    - Fake post. n/t Newsboy 18:16:28 4/1/2000 (0)
- Ah yes, the ever famous avoid the truth through insults. NT Xzortok 06:28:30 4/1/2000 (11)
  - Ever stop to think that there's an agreement between the two cabals? Ragers kill their mages, warders kill the defilers. What would a war between the two accomplish? Beside ending your ignorant whining. NOTHING. n/t Newsboy 06:32:04 4/1/2000 (10)
    - I am glad you finally admitted that, of course I have something to say. Someone 06:56:08 4/1/2000 (9)
      - Don't get me wrong.. many a times do non-defiler ragers end up defending the others against sylvans and vice versa. don't go thinking all is well in the happy go lucky alliance of Battle and Sylvan. n/t Newsboy 07:32:46 4/1/2000 (5)
        
        I guess it is all a matter of how you look at it. Xzortok 08:32:56 4/1/2000 (4)
        
        Re: I guess it is all a matter of how you look at it. Entity 06:47:49 4/2/2000 (3)
        
        The strongest of the strong accept that, that is Empire all the way....Go ragers!!NT Xzortok 12:06:28 4/2/2000 (0)
        
        If ragers made this deal with warders, it should hold for all non-cabaled warriors that have mage friends..NT Someone 12:04:26 4/2/2000 (1)
        
        Why? Do all those uncaballed warriors fight the tower? Entity 12:25:10 4/4/2000 (0)
      - Take a hate groups like Nazis or the KKK Xzortok 07:11:24 4/1/2000 (2)
        
        Courage Entity 06:55:10 4/2/2000 (1)
        
        Accepting a group that allows mages is pretty dam wimpy to me when I claim I hate them more than anything else in the world...NT Someone 12:10:35 4/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > But I really do not see how you can justify how allowing a cabal to have mages in it. > If they support mages, they are protecting mages, they are helping mages. The simple reason that I can think of you do not enforce this is because you are afraid to fight every cabal in the game like Empire, which kinda goes against the whole courage thing. I could be wrong but it is time battle stop having your cake and eating it too.