Posted by ORB on January 5, 2000 at 21:27:000:

In Reply to: A Guess posted by Uhm on January 5, 2000 at 21:19:29:

> Frankly, I agree with you.

> However, I think the reason it hasn't been
> dealt with is the fact that there are so many
> areas and so many items in those areas that
> no one wants to go through and correct the
> AC of everything.

> I'm not going to cite specific examples, but
> anyone who has seen more than 50 pieces of
> equipment has seen rings that have better AC
> than some breastplates. There is a multiple
> for some body parts, but even with this some
> piss poor slots still do better than the
> core ones (helm, torso, etc).

> From what I've seen the new areas have had
> a more realistic corelation between armor
> and the AC it has, but damn it would take a
> *long* time to fix everything already in
> place.

Follow Ups:

• Rings Vs. Plate Cassman 000:27:43 1/6/2000 (4)
  • Point about armor Hevesaque 13:47:005 1/6/2000 (1)
    • Weight Salipek 14:000:46 1/6/2000 (0)
  • Re: AC on body wear is multiplied by three when you wear it, in case you didn't notice (nt) Rune(VIP) 004:40:11 1/6/2000 (1)
    • Rings,Amulets ect Vs. Armor Bacrie 006:20:58 1/6/2000 (0)

Post a Followup