Posted by Dennis Miller on April 2, 2000 at 19:47:14:
In Reply to: Half-misunderstanding, half-bad wording... posted by Polemachus on April 2, 2000 at 18:46:42:
So tell me. When all those young arbiter applicants
come to the stern guard, they are breaking the law?
How about when entropy is retrieving..yes they are
exempted from the attacking the stern guard rule..but
do they not break the tresspassing rule?
The law about intrusion refers to attacking or passing
that of the stern guard. The law was there originaly
when by standing at the entrance of the cabal, you would
the guardian would attack since back then there was no
inner/outter guardian. Just the guardian which was agro
to which then entering the outter room was against the
law for it was an attack on the cabal.
No longer does stepping into the room causes an attack, so
it is not an attack on the cabal. As to the guards
who attack..I have been attacked by one in Ofcal. Should
I not be flaged for being attacked? for tresspassing? I was
in a room where the guard attacked. I was not a criminal nor
entropy.
So sorry. I dont buy this garbage "You were standing at the
stern guard. You are a criminal" Go feed that garbage to
some other shumck