Posted by Sgt Leg on May 4, 2000 at 20:55:44:

This is how I justify it so I can fit things into my perception of Theran Law.

I generaly don't kill Galadonian guards unless I'm very short on time and of course neutralor the very rare evil. I always consider human mobs as viable players. Hell I don't kill dock workers.

at any rate I've decided to view the Arbiters as the Protectors of the Guilds not the cities or the opressors of the other cabals.

In My fantasy the Guilds of the protected cities pay the arbiters so that their members might have a place to rest and carry on the basics of living. The smaller cities aren't rich enough to raise the dues and of course the wilds to vast and of no intrest to the guilds.

Rangers and Druids are a little farther out but I'll live with it.

My take. anyone else have an outlook?

FTA

Follow Ups:

• Seems everyone missed my point. Sgt Leg 05:35:20 5/5/2000 (1)
  • I just wanted to give my point view(n/t) Nobody 05:54:01 5/5/2000 (0)
• Don't be fooled Humble Healer 01:34:40 5/5/2000 (0)
• Is the Arbiters code of Laws the same as Galadons?(text) Nobody 21:59:38 5/4/2000 (4)
  • I think... Someone 01:10:53 5/5/2000 (1)
    • That would be attacking in town (generally not to get into if thaey were out of town) so the Enforcer would have a reason to kill but is the Enforcer following Arbiter Laws ... if not he had no reason ... but it all comes down to my question above(n/t) Nobody 04:02:50 5/5/2000 (0)
  • Well said, except... Leorinth 00:11:23 5/5/2000 (1)
    • Thankyou and I can see your point but .... Nobody 04:08:00 5/5/2000 (0)
• Re: Arbiter Law vS City law, my take. Bhindraith 21:30:06 5/4/2000 (2)
  • Re: Arbiter Law vS City law, my take. SeanyC 21:44:51 5/4/2000 (1)
    • Re: Arbiter Law vS City law, my take. Epswelep 21:47:51 5/4/2000 (0)
• Re: Arbiter Law vS City law, my take. Epselwep 21:29:11 5/4/2000 (0)

Post a Followup