Posted by Confused and Abused on May 16, 2000 at 10:12:56:

Now something struck me as odd while reading the log board. In a fight I myself had I boneshattered a warrior which caused him to lose his dual sword. The very next round he flurries (I can post the log later). I figured it was something that could just be done since certain spirits can flurry using one sword. But then I saw this log:

Ioanis vs Muskul

630hp 366m 741mv flurry
630hp 366m 741mv You must dual wield two swords to flurry.
Muskul has some small but disgusting cuts


And then this one:

Minaclar vs Aradan

"Oh. Also. He was withered and lost his Armageddon.
Yeow."

Someone starts a vicious series of attacks with its swords.
You manage to partially parry its attack, but are still hit


So which is suppose to be right? Can you flurry with only one sword? Is the part in Ioanis' log just a typo/bug or what? Thanks.

Follow Ups:

• To clear this up, you are right it is a typo and some people need to piss off. Some Warrior 01:05:37 5/17/2000 (0)
• Actually..while some of the insight was helpful..could you delete this thread? wasted enough space..sorry n/t Confused and Abused 15:15:26 5/16/2000 (0)
• Re: Ok, I think I can clear this up Rune(VIP) 15:05:17 5/16/2000 (0)
• Re: A bug with Flurry? Zulghinlour(IMM) 13:33:56 5/16/2000 (3)
  • Re: A bug with Flurry? Confused and Abused 14:07:39 5/16/2000 (2)
    • hardly Graham 14:52:33 5/16/2000 (1)
      • Re: hardly Confused and Abused 15:12:52 5/16/2000 (0)
• I was unclear. I hit a -25str wither, he lost his Armageddon, and wielded (I think) two frostbrands. n/t Aradan 10:27:01 5/16/2000 (14)
  • hrm Watcher 14:12:24 5/16/2000 (6)
    • Hey...this kind of flame is UNCALLED for...you need to calm yourself down...or see a healer to doit for you (NT) Chengdu 17:54:23 5/16/2000 (0)
    • Re: Did I miss something? Harlequin 15:37:16 5/16/2000 (0)
    • Re: hrm Someone 14:29:04 5/16/2000 (3)
      • Re: hrm idiot 14:33:30 5/16/2000 (2)
        • El Wrongo' Rome 15:23:42 5/16/2000 (0)
        • Re: hrm Not Aradan 14:44:37 5/16/2000 (0)
  • Roger but... Confused and Abused 10:54:58 5/16/2000 (6)
    • umm flurry only requires 1 sword? Graham 11:57:31 5/16/2000 (5)
      • My point being: "You must dual wield two swords to flurry." Confused and Abused 12:43:49 5/16/2000 (4)
        • no you dont. you can flurry with one sword (little text) Magtograme 13:30:12 5/16/2000 (3)
          • Sheesh..I am not saying you have to..it is there plain as daylight in a log n/t Confused and Abused 14:05:06 5/16/2000 (2)
            • My guess is you have to perfect flurry to do it with one sword. It just seems... right. (n/t) Darlow (he who's never played a sword spec) 14:35:03 5/16/2000 (1)
              • wrong guess - you dont have to have flurry perfected(nt) Magtograme 15:03:18 5/16/2000 (0)
• answer Grallon 10:24:33 5/16/2000 (4)
  • Almost right, except that whip/flail CAN be done from the off-hand. n/t Pendragon_Surtr 22:21:33 5/16/2000 (2)
    • Incorrect. No whip/flail spec can be done with only a whip in the offhand,(text) Grallon 05:41:10 5/17/2000 (1)
      • Sorry, I must not have been clear. Here is how it works. Pendragon_Surtr 22:55:48 5/17/2000 (0)
  • Sounds like a BUG to me (nt) Old Fart 10:27:41 5/16/2000 (0)

Post a Followup