I think people who play bards like warriors with songs should be shot, they're a roleplaying class and if you don't do something artsy you're wasting the class. nt

I think people who play bards like warriors with songs should be shot, they're a roleplaying class and if you don't do something artsy you're wasting the class. nt:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Imbrogno on August 8, 2000 at 11:41:50:

In Reply to: I don't understand what you're saying here: posted by Macheath on August 8, 2000 at 11:35:52:

> >Without communes/songs/spells, a bard could certainly hold ground against a shaman, and would whoop an invoker.

> Bards shouldn't be played like warriors, though. If your point is that invokers and shamans have worse physical abilities than bards, I'd say sure... but that's a downright silly way to measure all three classes.

Follow Ups:

What are we conforming to? The First Apostle 12:04:13 8/8/2000 (5)
- You misunderstand what I mean by artsy Imbrogno 12:26:40 8/8/2000 (4)
  - Bards Tracker of the Wicked(VIP) 13:42:54 8/8/2000 (1)
    - Heh, I remember them because I was constantly fighting them. I think it was Ingvar that said Arlian had no verbal skills. nt Imbrogno 14:04:30 8/8/2000 (0)
  - Exacatly. Scaurus(VIP) 12:40:46 8/8/2000 (1)
    - I knew you'd chime in. The First Apostle 12:55:52 8/8/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > >Without communes/songs/spells, a bard could certainly hold ground against a shaman, and would whoop an invoker. > > Bards shouldn't be played like warriors, though. If your point is that invokers and shamans have worse physical abilities than bards, I'd say sure... but that's a downright silly way to measure all three classes.