I don't understand what you're saying here:

I don't understand what you're saying here::
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Macheath on August 8, 2000 at 11:35:52:

In Reply to: Well.... posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on August 7, 2000 at 20:50:49:

>Without communes/songs/spells, a bard could certainly hold ground against a shaman, and would whoop an invoker.

Bards shouldn't be played like warriors, though. If your point is that invokers and shamans have worse physical abilities than bards, I'd say sure... but that's a downright silly way to measure all three classes.

Follow Ups:

What I was actually talking about... Proud Blade(VIP) 14:44:33 8/8/2000 (0)
I think people who play bards like warriors with songs should be shot, they're a roleplaying class and if you don't do something artsy you're wasting the class. nt Imbrogno 11:41:50 8/8/2000 (6)
- What are we conforming to? The First Apostle 12:04:13 8/8/2000 (5)
  - You misunderstand what I mean by artsy Imbrogno 12:26:40 8/8/2000 (4)
    - Bards Tracker of the Wicked(VIP) 13:42:54 8/8/2000 (1)
      - Heh, I remember them because I was constantly fighting them. I think it was Ingvar that said Arlian had no verbal skills. nt Imbrogno 14:04:30 8/8/2000 (0)
    - Exacatly. Scaurus(VIP) 12:40:46 8/8/2000 (1)
      - I knew you'd chime in. The First Apostle 12:55:52 8/8/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> >Without communes/songs/spells, a bard could certainly hold ground against a shaman, and would whoop an invoker. > Bards shouldn't be played like warriors, though. If your point is that invokers and shamans have worse physical abilities than bards, I'd say sure... but that's a downright silly way to measure all three classes.