Posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on October 25, 2000 at 11:29:57:

In Reply to: Quick two cents on Battle v. Arbiters posted by The Arcane(VIP) on October 25, 2000 at 09:56:21:

Those laws/Arbiters protect Battle as well, though (in theory). Does that change anything?

Regardless, I think we can agree that a mage of any kind should be a higher priority than an Arbiter, all things being equal?

Follow Ups:

• I protected a rager once... Kelbecso 13:58:50 10/25/2000 (0)
• Re: Devil's Advocate Ludi 12:45:59 10/25/2000 (0)
• Arbiters help ragers, since when? Rager 12:31:55 10/25/2000 (0)
• Re: Devil's Advocate The First Apostle 11:59:23 10/25/2000 (8)
  • It's called selective memory and everybody uses it to justify their own claims, ragers are just generally better at it then most. Your learn from your mistakes, and manage to perfect your ability to block out things that don't suit your purpose! NT Imbrogno(VIP) 12:20:00 10/25/2000 (7)
    • Argh. Imbrogno, if you're still playing, *PLEASE* tell me you're playing a future rager leader for perspective. n/t TotW(VIP) 12:26:43 10/25/2000 (6)
      • *snickers* Every time I roll up a rager wannabe I get to 20th, feel dirty, and delete. I will play one in the future, but not when there are a bazillion of them 'cause frankly I won't be able to take all of the rager-speak. nt Imbrogno(VIP) 12:28:21 10/25/2000 (5)
        • For the Love of God stop rehashing this tired subject until you have done so N/T Thinhallen 15:29:00 10/25/2000 (4)
          • I agree, 150%. It's more than a little odd that Quintius of all people is instructing ragers on how they 'should act' (small quote): TotW(VIP) 15:51:47 10/25/2000 (3)
            • Hrm Quintius 20:35:41 10/25/2000 (0)
            • $0.02 U.S. currency Nepenthe(IMM) 16:24:16 10/25/2000 (1)
              • He was neutral/lawful. The gnome muter Lord during mine and Quintius' time. Can't think of the name. nt Imbrogno(VIP) 17:50:53 10/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup