you misinterpret his words

July 08, 2008 10:26AM
By the time he's got the entwine off and is ready to flurry, he'll be so maledicted or hurt that there would be no point anymore, and it would just get him killed.

entwine gives the dagger spec at least three free rounds of action, of which two are with you disarmed. Also, dirting you would fuck that flurry longer, since you can't re-wield to flurry unless you have maelstrom. And even then, good luck hitting a flurry of any real power with -15 or so strength, more if the dagger spec manages a successful stab/twist or uses a maledict from his second spec.

Basically, unless your a rager with call bloodthirst to completely negate the effects of dagger maledicts, that plan fails. Sorry.
Subject Author Views Posted

As it was requested, Kanjiro vs Hect

LogFiend 924 July 07, 2008 07:10PM

Hamstring > Rager (nt)

cointreau 364 July 08, 2008 12:33AM

9 rounds = 2 hits, deleting my 1 rank dwarf now! nt

zanzarin 314 July 07, 2008 10:51PM

Entwine+flurry owns unprepped dex warriors.

Engurd 416 July 08, 2008 12:54AM

Don't entwine. Keep it simple: Flurry after he hamstrings. If it doesn't work, run after flurry lag. nt

Drokk 288 July 08, 2008 11:24PM

Good point too. Or bash, bash, fluuuurrrry! -nt

Engurd 307 July 09, 2008 08:41AM

And entwine 23-25 dex war and land more then 5 hits flurry as dwarf is a big big problem. Nice joke! nt

zanzarin 357 July 08, 2008 01:02AM

Entwine is not dex based i believe, from my experience. Someone else here mentioned it too, i just do not remember who.

Engurd 384 July 08, 2008 01:23AM

you misinterpret his words

vortexmagus 444 July 08, 2008 10:26AM

You're completely wrong about some things.

Sam 354 July 08, 2008 02:09PM

well, I love you, but you're making assumptions here

vortexmagus 465 July 08, 2008 06:32PM

Oh hey, yeah. It was just a small point I disagreed with heh.

Sam 352 July 08, 2008 07:30PM

Nice theory. May i know when you played your last whip/sword dwarf? Or even not a dwarf. -nt

Engurd 309 July 08, 2008 12:53PM

irrelevant to discussion

vortexmagus 457 July 08, 2008 07:43PM

Heh, check this (Tirka is an arial): http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/read.php?3,633644 ,633644#msg-633644 -nt

Engurd 544 July 09, 2008 08:35AM

Are you on crack?

vortexmagus 449 July 09, 2008 04:57PM

I think Humbert was doing well enough against Kostyan either

Engurd 440 July 10, 2008 04:42AM

Whats your point with this log? nt.

aussie13 299 July 09, 2008 11:47AM

Same point as you can see in this log: http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/read.php?3,63 2667,632667#msg-632667

Engurd 305 July 10, 2008 04:22AM

Who cares? It's not like all of your characters haven't sucked.

Krilcov 366 July 08, 2008 03:15PM

I should probably just avoid talking with you, as every of your posts are senseless rant.

Engurd 303 July 08, 2008 06:00PM

Or... you know...

Krilcov 308 July 08, 2008 09:38PM

Ya, I got worked hard. Just annoyed having two pincers avoided, the rest miss, and having ....

aussie13 381 July 07, 2008 10:39PM

There few factors that can't be left unnoticed

Engurd 437 July 08, 2008 12:48AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 122
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 178 May 01, 2024