I have no sympathy for Villagers against 'Rot'.

WarEagle

April 14, 2009 03:56PM

Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 581

Seriously, can we pick out other spells/skills that suck shit for other race/classes.

How about the uncaballed, can we talk about that? Because they really take it up the ass. I'm going to be starting a topic on the Main Board about how everything needs to balance out for the lvl 51 hero that said you know what, I'm not joining a cabal...make things even for me.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Uggro vs Zerrla //Rotting	LogFiend	925	April 14, 2009 12:31PM
Rot ideas	Quixotic	430	April 15, 2009 08:25AM
hmmm. txt	Isildur(VIP)	427	April 15, 2009 08:57AM
So the body rots to a very unhealthy position and then continues to tumble apart, WITHOUT dying.	Batman	389	April 15, 2009 09:05AM
i'm going to post a revised and extended version of this on officials, with some arguments on its behalf. nt	Isildur(VIP)	312	April 15, 2009 09:32AM
Five makes it better. NT	Batman	276	April 15, 2009 08:47AM
I'm a huge fan of numbers 2 and 5. nt.	NeverMindTheWarlocks	354	April 15, 2009 08:38AM
Rot	BattleCharmed	500	April 15, 2009 01:32AM
As I've played a bunch of villagers...	deriveh	461	April 15, 2009 06:37AM
Nice log nt	dervish	326	April 15, 2009 02:02AM
Thanks. Its almost as good as this one. (log)	BattleCharmed	298	April 15, 2009 01:24PM
Ok, check this out	NbM	411	April 14, 2009 04:36PM
I dont get it.	K-B	482	April 14, 2009 01:21PM
Bleh. Yet another chore to add to my regear list. (nt)	cointreau	308	April 15, 2009 03:29PM
It's harder as a villager... (info inside)	deriveh	423	April 14, 2009 02:08PM
I see what you are saying...(txt)	K-B	366	April 15, 2009 11:13AM
I have no sympathy for Villagers against 'Rot'.	WarEagle	456	April 14, 2009 03:56PM
DB isn't overpowered, but it sure justifies the entire cabal taking it up the ass both for shitty sportsmanship from their opponents and rot and assassinate etc. nt	Scrimbul	338	April 15, 2009 11:11PM
uncaballed don't have to go into the bad situations nt	daurwyn(VIP)	356	April 14, 2009 10:41PM
its a mixed bag. txt	Isildur(VIP)	345	April 15, 2009 08:29PM
If empire thief is around and I'm uncaballed goodie, assuming I want to kill this thief...	Scrimbul	386	April 15, 2009 11:10PM
Re: If empire thief is around and I'm uncaballed goodie, assuming I want to kill this thief...	Isildur(VIP)	331	April 16, 2009 06:13AM
There's a difference between hiding offensively, hiding defensively, and making it look like you're not aware of their presence.	Scrimbul	302	April 16, 2009 10:11AM
Re: There's a difference between hiding offensively, hiding defensively, and making it look like you're not aware of their presence.	Isildur(VIP)	293	April 16, 2009 10:36AM
And then you said "Wait!"	cartherlen	391	April 14, 2009 10:27PM
Except, I'm playing.	WarEagle	469	April 15, 2009 08:26AM
I've decided	cartherlen	408	April 15, 2009 05:11AM
You can be carrying enough	daurwyn(VIP)	365	April 14, 2009 03:07PM
Why do you think the fact that one rager survived one rot with low con = every rager can easily survive every rot? Seriously.	Balrahd(VIP)	378	April 14, 2009 03:22PM
Come on	daurwyn(VIP)	392	April 14, 2009 10:43PM
also worth adding	daurwyn(VIP)	412	April 14, 2009 10:50PM
The question is rather if it's worth the trouble	WraithOfLight	337	April 15, 2009 07:28AM
Korrock had the rot edge. His rot could be -30 at times. That's why. NT	Sam	314	April 14, 2009 04:28PM
Fantastic.	WarEagle	373	April 14, 2009 04:32PM
Since you are so much for this.	WarEagle	336	April 14, 2009 04:09PM
OK, I get your point, thanks. n/t	Balrahd(VIP)	264	April 14, 2009 04:15PM
Re: Why do you think the fact that one rager survived one rot with low con = every rager can easily survive every rot? Seriously.	Isildur(VIP)	366	April 14, 2009 03:47PM
I'm not saying I like rot or that it is good as it is	daurwyn(VIP)	419	April 14, 2009 10:45PM
About Rot.	WarEagle	390	April 14, 2009 12:53PM
It kills low-con villagers, as well as characters that stick around to defend their cabal for RP reasons.	Balrahd(VIP)	343	April 14, 2009 01:36PM
Two things	daurwyn(VIP)	350	April 14, 2009 12:36PM
Such a pathetic tactic it makes me sick. I still can't believe the IMMS haven't changed it. That is seriously..	aussie13	422	April 14, 2009 12:34PM
i kind of agree. txt	Isildur(VIP)	405	April 14, 2009 01:47PM
I had 11 natural con with nererial	daurwyn(VIP)	367	April 14, 2009 03:04PM
Viscious cycle. Viscious. n/t	alansmithee	268	April 14, 2009 03:34PM
Vicious, anyone? nt	Java	252	April 14, 2009 03:43PM
No thanks, maybe another time. NT	Batman	304	April 14, 2009 03:54PM
That's why it shouldn't work	daurwyn(VIP)	446	April 14, 2009 12:37PM
Don't defend it	Mek	396	April 14, 2009 12:44PM
I know they'll land it	daurwyn(VIP)	378	April 14, 2009 12:50PM
Re: I know they'll land it	briartangle	373	April 14, 2009 06:02PM
Thanks for the visual. nt	smashtro	401	April 14, 2009 11:40PM
Well said. nt	The Forsaken(VIP)	287	April 14, 2009 06:04PM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 25

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken