Since you're dumb this is my last post here

December 22, 2009 05:35PM
Hatred of magic is the primary concept of Battleragers.
You can have various roles but they all should incorporate hunting mages. If you don't, then your role doesn't fit well the cabal (it can be a great role and you can go solo or join other cabals. Like a druid in outlanders who hunted mages).
Similarly, you can't create valid roles for other cabals if it violates their primary concepts.
Examples:
- a tribunal who let some criminals live (because they pay him or his mother is outlander)
- a fortress member who loves dark elves and thus don't hunt them
- an outlander who likes money and adamantatite armor (because it's shining and gives good damroll).
Those roles don't fit corresponding cabals. True, if you have dumb leaders/immortals you can get away with it as you can get away with anything else. But that doesn't make wrong things right.
Subject Author Views Posted

Qaqah's first mage kill.

The Forsaken(VIP) 730 December 22, 2009 07:52AM

So, what warrents an anom log and non-anom log? (n/t)

Circle 275 December 22, 2009 10:31AM

It's a deleted character. nt

The Forsaken(VIP) 277 December 22, 2009 10:37AM

oh! so after character deleted = no need to anom other wise anom? (n/t)

Circle 279 December 22, 2009 11:16AM

No. Always should more a NOM NOM NOM! (n/t)

Jib 282 December 22, 2009 11:20AM

He could be lying. nt (edit: in response to dwog)

durrwan 314 December 22, 2009 09:23AM

Horrible rager RP

Dwoggurd 446 December 22, 2009 09:11AM

I don't think you realize the context.

Splntrd 371 December 22, 2009 10:40AM

Rager apps are moving targets

Dwoggurd 405 December 22, 2009 11:30AM

How is that at all relevant? nt

Splntrd 271 December 22, 2009 11:31AM

Directly (n/t)

Dwoggurd 336 December 22, 2009 11:34AM

Except it isn't. We were talking about empathy and how frustrated the mage was and how nice the rager was.

Splntrd 300 December 22, 2009 11:51AM

Dwog is right. You confuse IC and OOC. nt

Flipside Oreo 261 December 22, 2009 03:07PM

No, I'm not confused. I agree the decision was OOC. But it's not incompatible with rager RP, and...

Splntrd 306 December 22, 2009 03:14PM

Why would you ever as a rager NOT want to bother/kill a mage? (n/t)

sleepy 270 December 22, 2009 03:25PM

Have you never broken role for OOC concerns? I think this one is more valid than most. nt

Splntrd 292 December 22, 2009 04:15PM

Definitely.

sleepy 303 December 22, 2009 04:29PM

There are a lot of potential rager roles that don't involve the wholesale slaughter of mages.

Sam 281 December 22, 2009 03:39PM

Misinfo

Dwoggurd 370 December 22, 2009 04:06PM

You talk as if you created the cabal.

Sam 341 December 22, 2009 04:40PM

Since you're dumb this is my last post here

Dwoggurd 430 December 22, 2009 05:35PM

Actually, that's not quite true.

The Forsaken(VIP) 332 December 22, 2009 05:57PM

Since you're obtuse and somewhat limited in creativity, I'll make it easy.

Sam 301 December 22, 2009 05:41PM

Ps By the way, this doesn't make you a bad player/person at all. In fact I've actually really liked 1 of your characters. NT

Sam 280 December 22, 2009 10:10PM

I don't even know you, but from your posts I'm going to have to agree with TMN (n/t)

madcap 281 December 22, 2009 06:46PM

Dwoggurd + risk = does not compute

The Forsaken(VIP) 394 December 22, 2009 09:41AM

Sorry for killing you in a PK mud (n/t)

Dwoggurd 272 December 22, 2009 09:49AM

Name it.

The Forsaken(VIP) 391 December 22, 2009 10:18AM

Retarded. nt

Lye 309 December 22, 2009 10:00AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 145
Record Number of Users: 1 April 26, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 172 April 28, 2024