Nice log. (nt)

December 23, 2009 05:16PM
Subject Author Views Posted

Fun raid at the Island

LogFiend 729 December 23, 2009 01:12PM

HE'S DRUNK, HE'S PISSED, HE'LL KILL YOU IN THE LISTS!!! LICHTENSTEIN! n/t

oawenisou 259 December 23, 2009 07:16PM

I'm confused.

sleepy 359 December 23, 2009 06:37PM

No

_Magus_ 348 December 23, 2009 09:04PM

Oh. I thought Ullrik was a hero. Woe for not playing in months. (n/t)

sleepy 229 December 23, 2009 09:27PM

I cringe every time I see a non-healer/bard get rescued when they are fighting multiple enemies.

Sam 295 December 23, 2009 06:25PM

It's only 1 round lag though - right?

Jatropha 232 December 24, 2009 04:46AM

I cringe every time I see my bards get rescued when they are fighting multiple enemies. (n/t)

alex 241 December 23, 2009 09:17PM

:( I expected you would have enough dam redux and be able to land symphonic already ;) NT

Sam 257 December 23, 2009 09:58PM

Yeah, but I wish to kill em all!;) How I supposed to do it being lagged from my own groupmate rescue?...On other hand there is a posssibility of norescue... (n/t)

alex 247 December 23, 2009 10:06PM

Nice log. (nt)

lightmage 245 December 23, 2009 05:16PM

Whattt

sleepy 359 December 23, 2009 02:06PM

Bloodthirst lowers lag. Bashing is a bad idea, go for pure damage skills. nt

Yhorian(VIP) 225 December 23, 2009 06:07PM

Sarcastic jokes never do well on the internet. :( (n/t)

sleepy 293 December 23, 2009 06:34PM

Misinfo. (n/t)

alansmithee 223 December 23, 2009 06:12PM

This is your funniest post ever. NT

Sam 237 December 23, 2009 06:23PM

So you'd recommend trying to lag a hasted warrior with lag reduction? nt

Yhorian(VIP) 219 December 23, 2009 06:13PM

I think he disagrees that thirst reduces lag. nt

Isildur(VIP) 192 December 23, 2009 06:34PM

Seeing as how he was the biggest proponent of saying thirst DID lower lag, that's why I find his post funny. NT

Sam 188 December 23, 2009 07:27PM

Or maybe he was the one arguing it didn't and is still on the fading soapbox.

Sam 232 December 23, 2009 07:34PM

Can != likely or even close to likely.

alansmithee 311 December 23, 2009 07:51PM

You wouldn't necessarily know

daurwyn(VIP) 250 December 27, 2009 12:40PM

Hey love... you're wrong. Its okay, everyone is, sometimes. Man up and admit it, yeesh. (n/t)

vortexmagus 195 December 24, 2009 07:02PM

Still on that crumbling soapbox huh? I've seen it happen multiple times in one log.

Sam 306 December 23, 2009 08:19PM

yawl should aks nepentha nt

Cosimo 234 December 24, 2009 07:45PM

I thought that it reduces the chance of getting hit with larger amounts of lag. Am I wrong? (n/t)

sleepy 191 December 23, 2009 06:39PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 90
Record Number of Users: 1 April 26, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 133 April 26, 2024