not really. txt

March 25, 2010 01:32PM
Saccing it right after the guy just unghosted is a move designed just to penalize him an extra 1/3 point of CON.

Even if we ignore that move, having destruction of an unholy weapon harm the AP is still useful. For instance, you might kill him, take the biggish unholy, then just keep it around for a while, until he gets some more pimp gear. Then you attack him, let him get semi-hurt, then flee/drop/sac to finish him. The risk, of course, is that he kills *you* and gets the unholy back.

Having the unholy harm the guy is also meaningful in cases where he somehow gets disarmed prior to dying. Sac weapon = (hopefully) dead AP. Point being: you're killing him once, just like you treat anyone else, because he's your enemy and hopefully you want something he has. You're not just giving him 2 deaths to be an ass.
Subject Author Views Posted

Why Angels can be fun....

LogFiend 690 March 25, 2010 10:46AM

Honestly, that's kind of a bitch move

daurwyn(VIP) 489 March 25, 2010 11:00AM

IMO it's just a risk of having an unholy. Just like having and using familiars. (n/t)

sleepy 226 March 25, 2010 03:05PM

Big difference

daurwyn(VIP) 310 March 25, 2010 04:12PM

Agreed that need for unholies > need for familiars

sleepy 255 March 25, 2010 07:03PM

haha u r dum go read a pm n/t

jalim 213 March 25, 2010 01:23PM

I'm going to disagree with you here.

jafel 384 March 25, 2010 01:15PM

Well, that's a good point

daurwyn(VIP) 280 March 25, 2010 04:19PM

Well...

jafel 309 March 25, 2010 04:36PM

What?! That's the whole point of having it harm them when you sac it. (n/t)

ORB 217 March 25, 2010 12:33PM

not really. txt

Isildur(VIP) 342 March 25, 2010 01:32PM

Also if it is a well charged unholy

daurwyn(VIP) 264 March 25, 2010 04:37PM

Bingo

daurwyn(VIP) 261 March 25, 2010 04:09PM

Quick fix - don't lose your weapon, Bernard (n/t)

entropissed 312 March 25, 2010 11:38AM

Only one I lost strong enough to kill me

daurwyn(VIP) 257 March 25, 2010 04:11PM

It is still perfectly legitimate though. ~

_Magus_ 226 March 25, 2010 11:15AM

Just like following ghosts around and killing them when they unghost (n/t)

cenatar 209 March 25, 2010 01:05PM

Not sure if imms fixed bug with saccing unholy leading to killing of an AP, but leeching still works to kill a ghost. (n/t)

Engurd 208 March 25, 2010 02:19PM

It may be related to ghost time

daurwyn(VIP) 254 March 25, 2010 04:20PM

Hah, lucky! (n/t)

Engurd 259 March 25, 2010 04:39PM

We could spend all day listing 'legit' bitch moves, but sac'ing an unholy isn't one of them. nt

nodak 200 March 25, 2010 01:23PM

I didn't say saccing it was

daurwyn(VIP) 249 March 25, 2010 04:14PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 37
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024