Eh, if Thera was Balanced at the time then it's not against the rules to be killing both sides.

Dalbrin

October 07, 2010 08:52PM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 962

Bad long term strategy, maybe, but only maybe, because you're going to end up fighting Imperials and pissing them off at some point anyway.

It's just as possible to have a bloodthirsty neutral Nexun and have it be okay, as it is to have a bloodthirsty neutral Outlander.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Pt 2	LogFiend	527	October 07, 2010 09:16AM
Bleh! nexus 28, Empire 20, fortress 37, and Nexus now kills everything, cute nt	zanzarin	227	October 07, 2010 08:38PM
Eh, if Thera was Balanced at the time then it's not against the rules to be killing both sides.	Dalbrin	262	October 07, 2010 08:52PM
It's not bad RP proven your role states thus (and your actions).	Sam	230	October 08, 2010 10:47AM
I have no issue with the bloodthirsty if anyone of them was solid on their own	NacMacFeegle	252	October 07, 2010 11:18PM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Rhyaldrin

Guests: 64

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 172 April 28, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken

Eh, if Thera was Balanced at the time then it's not against the rules to be killing both sides.

Pt 2

Bleh! nexus 28, Empire 20, fortress 37, and Nexus now kills everything, cute nt

Eh, if Thera was Balanced at the time then it's not against the rules to be killing both sides.

It's not bad RP proven your role states thus (and your actions).

I have no issue with the bloodthirsty if anyone of them was solid on their own

Online Users