Possible solution:

April 02, 2011 08:36AM
You could try something like this:
[url="[url]http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/read.php?3,625714,625733#msg-625733"[/url];]<b>Xubetok vs Igbah</b>[/url]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/02/2011 08:37AM by Dwoggurd.
Subject Author Views Posted

I wish they'd do something about the sword spec

LogFiend 870 April 02, 2011 05:48AM

Ungras was not a villager in this log.

Gildenarm 325 April 03, 2011 11:16PM

Or

daurwyn(VIP) 310 April 03, 2011 11:21AM

Uh...

doge 311 April 03, 2011 08:08AM

beat up same said villager twice, never got me below 50%

turp 311 April 02, 2011 05:43PM

Don't ask for changes after the battle where you did the things wrong.

shaapa 452 April 02, 2011 09:21AM

Agreed nt

daurwyn(VIP) 278 April 03, 2011 11:22AM

This is a pretty dumb statement.

TripHitNdip 418 April 02, 2011 09:26AM

Holy crap...I agree with trip. Dirt/disarm verses hamstring/artery/stab (n/t)

funnyone 292 April 02, 2011 10:10AM

It's high dex dirt/disarm/trip + better offense + better defense vs hamstring -4 dex/artery - 4str/stab without twist.

shaapa 371 April 02, 2011 10:33AM

Re: It's high dex dirt/disarm/trip + better offense + better defense vs hamstring -4 dex/artery - 4str/stab without twist.

shaapa 296 April 02, 2011 10:53AM

I am so sad to hear it friend.

shaapa 333 April 02, 2011 09:36AM

I'm not saying those aren't viable tactics.

TripHitNdip 344 April 02, 2011 09:43AM

Let's say it this way.

shaapa 296 April 02, 2011 09:54AM

Especially if the best tactic for the other guy is bash

daurwyn(VIP) 265 April 04, 2011 08:53AM

That's funny because not too long ago everyone was saying "why would anyone play anything but dexy dagger build?"

Jib 324 April 02, 2011 09:02AM

misinfo

vortexmagus 344 April 03, 2011 04:22AM

Stop posting misinfo. n/t

kostyan 259 April 03, 2011 10:57AM

Misinfo (n/t)

alex 325 April 03, 2011 10:32AM

Possible solution:

Dwoggurd 418 April 02, 2011 08:36AM

You did it wrong

kostyan 455 April 02, 2011 07:03AM

what is the one skill that would have changed the fight?~

joe 294 April 02, 2011 07:34AM

Hamstring in combat would have changed the fight had it been a flee. =P (n/t)

TripHitNdip 247 April 02, 2011 08:25AM

Artery.

alex 384 April 02, 2011 07:41AM

Did you read the log?

funnyone 336 April 02, 2011 08:29AM

Meh. For PK stats yeah.

Sam 300 April 02, 2011 11:26AM

Outside of raids and ganks it's about equally brutal for both parties involved =P (n/t)

TripHitNdip 239 April 02, 2011 11:32AM

Sword is no doubt very/too good spec.

shaapa 308 April 02, 2011 09:43AM

Also...shield block?

Lokain 349 April 02, 2011 08:23AM

That's arguable

alex 291 April 02, 2011 09:48AM

Looks like RNG destroyed you. Sword Specialists are not overpowered. Infact, very few of the top PKers were Sword Specialists. (n/t)

BattleCharmed 265 April 02, 2011 06:41AM

50% of the top 10 warriors were sword specialists, according to the PK stats

_Magus_ 315 April 02, 2011 06:51AM

4 out of the bottom 6 were also sword specs. That's an irrelevant argument. nt

Flipside Oreo 224 April 02, 2011 06:45PM

Top end potential is all that matters. Nice try though. ~

_Magus_ 258 April 03, 2011 07:28AM

What about all of the warriors?

jc99as 293 April 03, 2011 08:21AM

Quite simply, the only sample set you'd really need to look at is the playerbase overall maximum potential...

_Magus_ 254 April 03, 2011 01:14PM

You were a dagger/polearm and you were on the list. What point are you arguing? NT

Sam 365 April 02, 2011 11:27AM

Hunsobo and Igbah aren't 5... (n/t)

BattleCharmed 232 April 02, 2011 06:52AM

Uhh, do you know how to count?

_Magus_ 374 April 02, 2011 06:58AM

Re: Uhh, do you know how to count?

Isildur(VIP) 360 April 02, 2011 07:44AM

I apologise. I said PKers, you said Sword Specs. I was continuing with mine.

BattleCharmed 304 April 02, 2011 07:05AM

No one should just be arbitrarily excluded just because of who played them. Sword spec is a sword spec dude. ~

_Magus_ 308 April 02, 2011 07:10AM

I suppose. But I still exclude Twist in PK stats. For various and obvious reasons. (n/t)

BattleCharmed 244 April 02, 2011 07:13AM

Here we go.

BattleCharmed 347 April 02, 2011 06:46AM

Also, you're making that 5/20 seem underrated...

_Magus_ 333 April 02, 2011 06:56AM

I agree with this

vortexmagus 277 April 04, 2011 03:59AM

redude self or enlarge self.

thomas 259 April 02, 2011 05:55AM

There's always enlarge or reduce. nt

falchiron 255 April 02, 2011 05:55AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 150
Record Number of Users: 1 April 26, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 172 April 28, 2024