but the banhammer usually only falls on a couple of people repeatedly instead of all of the offenders. Stevers, in this instance, is the unlikely voice of reason and your argument is basically "no, there's stuff you don't see that we do and we do everything possible before actually banning someone." Why not just admit that the system here is just as broken as the immstaff is in CF? Ain't no shame in admitting it, and you'd probably get a little more respect for it.