Posted by Ansellius on June 2, 2000 at 09:50:07:

In Reply to: No additional comments needed OR vindicated posted by Imbrogno on June 2, 2000 at 05:23:04:

Well fought, I wonder though... why did you fatigue instead of demonfire? Just a matter of practice?

Follow Ups:

• Fatigue could take half of Ioanis' moves in case Ioanis fled. With plague on him, if you stop him from getting to the Shrine, you've probably got him. Energy drain also does this (and mana), but it's not as damaging. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 09:56:14 6/2/2000 (40)
  • You're not aware of one completely nullifying thing to your point. n/t Wrong 10:11:52 6/2/2000 (34)
    • Re: If you are talking about bloodthirst, you are the wrong one (a little text) Rune(VIP) 15:40:26 6/2/2000 (2)
      • Re: If you are talking about bloodthirst, you are the wrong one (a little text) Niblaznacker 19:48:48 6/2/2000 (1)
        • Re: If they don't have mana, they can't use it. Believe me, 400 mana is sapped fast by plague (nt) Rune(VIP) 03:17:35 6/3/2000 (0)
    • So, tell us? The only thing I can think of is bloodthirst's affect on movement. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 10:32:52 6/2/2000 (30)
      • That's probably what he was talking about. For Imbrogno it's harm or fatigue and this was just one of those times that I chose the latter, even though cloud giants don't take harm so well. nt Imbrogno 10:51:56 6/2/2000 (29)
        • Any reason why you did not choose flee/rot instead of a damage sup? I think I would have done that...but I have never run a shaman so have no idea what I am talking about....nt Grallon 11:03:28 6/2/2000 (28)
          • Three reasons Imbrogno 12:00:56 6/2/2000 (27)
            • Though cloud giant con is good, Rager con is often lower, especially for an old vet like Ioanis. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 12:07:45 6/2/2000 (26)
              • Rot (woulda been n/t, but too long) Khiravn 15:49:54 6/2/2000 (23)
                • Re: Rot (woulda been n/t, but too long) Cheap Tactic? 18:02:32 6/2/2000 (16)
                  • His point... or possibly one of them Saerin 08:16:59 6/3/2000 (15)
                    • Khiravn's worst enemy was a shaman who he fought constantly. It's not like one wither did that. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 09:56:40 6/3/2000 (0)
                    • Rot is also incredibly easy to combat. nt Imbrogno 08:42:21 6/3/2000 (10)
                      • No it isn't. There are ways, but it depends on who you are. A rager with depleted con is in big trouble. (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 09:49:41 6/3/2000 (9)
                        • Yes it is Imbrogno 11:11:57 6/3/2000 (8)
                          • I love when people say things like "Just get two rings of fortitude". (n/t) Proud Blade(VIP) 12:11:49 6/3/2000 (7)
                            • Fine, don't wanna do fortitudes... Imbrogno 12:23:41 6/3/2000 (6)
                              • Look: Khiravn 12:40:45 6/3/2000 (5)
                                • my opinion, not that you asked for one Nepenthe(IMM) 14:50:48 6/3/2000 (3)
                                  • Heh Imbrogno 14:53:51 6/3/2000 (2)
                                    • Re: Heh Nepenthe(IMM) 15:03:42 6/3/2000 (1)
                                      • I tell you what, I'll trade cause light/serious/critical and demonfire for magic missile. nt Imbrogno 15:47:03 6/3/2000 (0)
                                • Looking at all of the facts can be fun too Imbrogno 13:21:09 6/3/2000 (0)
                    • Get your info straight. Wither decreases lifespan in hours. Rot does not. *smack* n/t Uhhhmmmm 08:24:35 6/3/2000 (2)
                      • My other point still stands. It's weak to rot someone and run off. Clear enough? (n/t) Saerin 08:51:27 6/3/2000 (1)
                        • I think I'd rather have them run off, that way I can run some place safe and be sure to get my gear back at the very least. NT Smirk 09:07:30 6/3/2000 (0)
                • Don't you dare think for a moment that Arlian wouldn't flee/sleep/fiend me in a heartbeat. nt Imbrogno 16:04:44 6/2/2000 (5)
                  • Only in your mind does flee/fiend equate to rot/recall. The only purpose of the 2nd is to easily con kill someone. n/t Khiravn 17:14:35 6/2/2000 (4)
                    • One word: Power Word Kill. Game, Set, Match. nt Grallon 11:07:26 6/7/2000 (0)
                    • and to me that's a beautiful thing. I hate ragers ooc and ic. nt Imbrogno 17:51:39 6/2/2000 (2)
                      • Reality check. Forum Reader 08:18:28 6/3/2000 (0)
                      • finally: Leradok 03:41:01 6/3/2000 (0)
              • All very true, but from this side of the fence it seems like con quests are handed out like candy. Though I know that isn't the case, it seems that way :) nt Imbrogno 12:10:58 6/2/2000 (1)
                • Or to put it more simply, and in a less inflammatory fashion, it's smart not to make assumptions about the con of ragers. nt Imbrogno 12:13:28 6/2/2000 (0)
  • I thought we had established earlier this month that fatigue didn't take away any moves... it just damaged. At least thats the way its work the ten or so times I've seen it. Ansellius 10:01:19 6/2/2000 (1)
    • We established that it does halve moves, just not every time it hits. nt Imbrogno 10:02:23 6/2/2000 (0)
  • I thought we had established earlier this month that fatigue didn't take away any moves... it just damaged. At least thats the way its work the ten or so times I've seen it. Ansellius 10:00:45 6/2/2000 (0)
  • Imbrogno also won't use demonfire, he hasn't even practiced it. Get to know him in the game and you'll know why. nt Imbrogno 09:59:14 6/2/2000 (1)
    • I'd love to... but I don't have a char that would give him the time of day. (And I'm not rolling one up just to ask you about demonfire) how bout the char board? Ansellius 10:13:35 6/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup