Posted by Jagaub on February 1, 2000 at 11:40:24:

In Reply to: I hate to defend Mithadris here, but.. posted by Defender of Law on February 1, 2000 at 10:54:18:

...The one boundary a Maran will not cross in their pursuit of destroying all who walk in darkness, is harming any of the Light...

...A Maran will sacrifice nearly anything to see darkness ended, even their own life if needed...it is not a path for those who fear bloodshed, or those who seek peace...
----------------------------------------
Based on this helpfile, I don't see any problem with a Maran Paladin breaking a law to destroy a necromancer. I also think you're all a bit too literal. The more we limit the possibilities of what a character can or cannot do, the less decent roleplaying we're going to see. However, if you enjoy cookie-cutter personalities, then you're on the right track to ensuring them in the future. And no, I don't think a couple of quirks alone makes a character's roleplay original.

Follow Ups:

• You the man, Jagaub. People read -way- too much into the alignment cookie-cutter roles. (n/t) Proud Blade 14:06:00 2/1/2000 (0)
• Laws, bah Delyn 12:00:01 2/1/2000 (0)
• Jagaub (text) Mithadris 11:55:56 2/1/2000 (2)
  • apples and oranges... Shokai(IMM) 15:40:58 2/1/2000 (0)
  • Why can't paladins fight the dark ie kill them in town and support the law at all other times??? Or do you wait till you get that huge slobbering dragon in market [] on a rules violation before you slay his ugly ass? Graham 12:33:12 2/1/2000 (0)

Post a Followup