Re: Question about the law.

Re: Question about the law.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Raerowr on April 2, 2000 at 08:48:28:

In Reply to: Re: Question about the law. posted by Oaken on April 2, 2000 at 08:32:48:

> Well it sounds to me like you weren't paying attention and walked right into the Arbiter cabal, it happens, just when it does, hope no Arbiters are on.

Ok..and that's a crime?

Follow Ups:

Re: Question about the law. Nesam 08:55:19 4/2/2000 (8)
- Uhm... GodMoney 13:00:10 4/2/2000 (7)
  - Wrong Polemachus 13:06:33 4/2/2000 (6)
    - Wrong...you must be talking about yourself...HA! GodMoney 18:38:54 4/2/2000 (5)
      - Half-misunderstanding, half-bad wording... Polemachus 18:46:42 4/2/2000 (4)
        
        I dont mean to get off on a rant here.... Dennis Miller 19:47:14 4/2/2000 (3)
        
        lookit Polemachus 04:33:09 4/3/2000 (0)
        
        It should be changed An Arbiter 01:21:04 4/3/2000 (1)
        
        Answer Grallon 06:37:07 4/3/2000 (0)
Re: Question about the law. Leud 08:53:21 4/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Well it sounds to me like you weren't paying attention and walked right into the Arbiter cabal, it happens, just when it does, hope no Arbiters are on. > > Ok..and that's a crime?