more clarifying than Clearasil on a 13 year olds face...:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Shokai(IMM) on April 25, 2000 at 14:01:34:

In Reply to: About putting your RP in your role... posted by TSM on April 24, 2000 at 16:40:36:

> You say to put it in your role if you are doing something that you shouldn't be doing as per your cabal. By doing this, you say the imm will know why we do it, and there for not toss us. But a while back, another imm said that they would toss a corrupt arbie if it was in their role because their shouldn't be corrupt arbies or something...so should, or shouldn't things like this be put in? Does it all depend on the imm? or if the imm is having a bad day or not? Perhaps things like this could be looked at by all the imms so you could all come to a decision that is the same, and follow that.
>
> -TSM


I'll correct myself...you have a far better chance of not getting tossed ass over kilter if your role backs you up. You may still get kicked...but other immortals are less likely to bar your way into other organizations, and what not if your role states why you were doing what you were doing. A role isn't a steadfast shield that allows you a 'break the rules free' card...just offers the immstaff a chance to see if the person is rp'ing or dicking around. As for being a corrupt Arbiter...I honestly think if you could do it well enough and never be caught by mortal/immortals...and had it in your role, until something was obviously done, and you slipped up...you wouldn't be axed (but don't quote me on that...I don't deal with Arbies)

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]