general comment on master leadership:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on August 25, 2000 at 12:14:58:

In Reply to: On the Narlock thing, blame me posted by Juxposona Lord Adept of Transmutation on August 25, 2000 at 11:41:49:

The leaders of Master, in general, have been free to decide to go with whatever theory of magic they want and enforce it or not at their choice. These theories are not necessarily endorsed by the imms of Master and 90% of the time are in some way a direct contradiction of how we think things should work. If a Master leader wants you to say conjuration is the magic of smiles, hugs, and non-rainy days before s/he'll induct you . . . probably I'm not going to step in.

I'm amazed (well, not really) that all of the players who complain about immortal micromanagement (in Arbiter or Empire, fr'ex) aren't jumping for joy and rubbing themselves with small furry mammals right now.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]