Conversely...

Conversely...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Caecus on October 25, 2000 at 12:34:03:

In Reply to: Quick two cents on Battle v. Arbiters posted by The Arcane(VIP) on October 25, 2000 at 09:56:21:

A'right. A few ideas.

1) Ignore anyone breaking the law to kill or steal from ragers. Make it so that ragers cannot hide within towns if they need to rest, and as well, any Arbiter may attack them in towns. If, however, ragers attack in towns, they get flagged.

2) Balance Arbiter powers to equal rager powers. Currently, a prepared Arbiter has a very bad chance against 3-4 ragers (which is generally what they end up attacking Arbiters in (they're at war, they can bullshit it that way). Therefore, make it so that an Arbiter can stand toe-to-toe with better guards, or something other than a shield, maybe, that gave them +hit/dam/hp/whatever to thwart the Battleragers.

I've played both sides, and I can say in all certainty, Arbiters are the ones that get shafted time and time again by this war. So, things should be balanced. Arbiters should not be fighting the 'greatest warriors in the world' with nothing but their class powers, as Battleragers, by virtue of BEING battleragers, get much more.

Just my thoughts.

Follow Ups:

The thing is Warrior 13:12:55 10/25/2000 (0)
You're joking, right? Umguy 12:51:56 10/25/2000 (8)
- Well. Tarakh 13:15:46 10/25/2000 (5)
  - My point wasn't that you sucked as leader... Umguy 13:25:30 10/25/2000 (4)
    - Heh. Tarakh 13:30:17 10/25/2000 (3)
      - Maybe it's just me... Umguy 13:45:32 10/25/2000 (2)
        
        Yes, yes, YES! Quintius 14:36:49 10/25/2000 (0)
        
        That would've been first assumption after hearing something like that, and minimizing inductions is something that a leader should do from 'Go' IMHO. There has to be a bench mark set above the reach of idiocy, most cabals don't have such a mark. nt Imbrogno(VIP) 13:56:25 10/25/2000 (0)
- I agree, oddly enough Imbrogno(VIP) 12:58:06 10/25/2000 (1)
  - I don't... fully... Quinthen 13:17:37 10/25/2000 (0)
Re: Conversely... Anonymous. (Probaly not spelled right) 12:38:49 10/25/2000 (1)
- Who's fault is that? Don't take the book and it becomes arbiters vs. wanted ragers and masters vs. ragers in general. NT Err 12:48:17 10/25/2000 (0)
*listens to the Battle Hymn of the Republic* nt Imbrogno 12:36:36 10/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > A'right. A few ideas. > 1) Ignore anyone breaking the law to kill or steal from ragers. Make it so that ragers cannot hide within towns if they need to rest, and as well, any Arbiter may attack them in towns. If, however, ragers attack in towns, they get flagged. > 2) Balance Arbiter powers to equal rager powers. Currently, a prepared Arbiter has a very bad chance against 3-4 ragers (which is generally what they end up attacking Arbiters in (they're at war, they can bullshit it that way). Therefore, make it so that an Arbiter can stand toe-to-toe with better guards, or something other than a shield, maybe, that gave them +hit/dam/hp/whatever to thwart the Battleragers. > I've played both sides, and I can say in all certainty, Arbiters are the ones that get shafted time and time again by this war. So, things should be balanced. Arbiters should not be fighting the 'greatest warriors in the world' with nothing but their class powers, as Battleragers, by virtue of BEING battleragers, get much more. > Just my thoughts.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]