They would still thrive because they'd because nothing would change for them n/t

Lokain

October 18, 2007 10:20AM

> When you're a not-for-profit organization you're given significant tax breaks because your business is supposedly providing a benefit to the community. Now there is no financial benefit to operating as a not-for-profit. <br>> <br>> As an example, AAA is a not-for-profit.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Democrat Propaganda Machine on Full Spin	Death_Claw	649	October 18, 2007 04:35AM
As a sidenote, this is just debating his lies and doesn't go into benefits.	Death_Claw	342	October 18, 2007 04:55AM
How about: Destroys tax incentive to give to charity? nt	Rade	382	October 18, 2007 05:27AM
That's an unfair statement.	Death_Claw	335	October 18, 2007 06:38AM
And not-for-profits? Those go away too	Rade	321	October 18, 2007 08:55AM
They would still thrive because they'd because nothing would change for them n/t	Lokain	313	October 18, 2007 10:20AM
Not for profit hospitals, for instance, have to compete with the for profit	Rade	315	October 18, 2007 12:05PM
uh.. Bruce Bartlett is a Republican. Nice try. ~	Chalupah	301	October 18, 2007 09:07AM
Since when? n/t	Death_Claw	370	October 18, 2007 02:45PM
You're right. For some reason I misread his other article.	Death_Claw	335	October 18, 2007 02:49PM
VAT and accounting	DurNominator	345	October 18, 2007 11:03AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 117

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 231 May 03, 2024