Not for profit hospitals, for instance, have to compete with the for profit

October 18, 2007 12:05PM
> > When you're a not-for-profit organization you're given significant tax breaks because your business is supposedly providing a benefit to the community. Now there is no financial benefit to operating as a not-for-profit. <br>> > <br>> > As an example, AAA is a not-for-profit. <br> <br>The deal with not-for-profits is that they must accept people without insurance and treat them. If that goes away they won't be able to compete with the for-profits who only have to keep them alive long enough to transfer them to a not-for-profit. Unless of course you'd rather socialize healthcare or let people die in the emergency room while people point at them and laugh for not having a good job.
Subject Author Views Posted

Democrat Propaganda Machine on Full Spin

Death_Claw 648 October 18, 2007 04:35AM

As a sidenote, this is just debating his lies and doesn't go into benefits.

Death_Claw 342 October 18, 2007 04:55AM

How about: Destroys tax incentive to give to charity? nt

Rade 381 October 18, 2007 05:27AM

That's an unfair statement.

Death_Claw 335 October 18, 2007 06:38AM

And not-for-profits? Those go away too

Rade 320 October 18, 2007 08:55AM

They would still thrive because they'd because nothing would change for them n/t

Lokain 313 October 18, 2007 10:20AM

Not for profit hospitals, for instance, have to compete with the for profit

Rade 314 October 18, 2007 12:05PM

uh.. Bruce Bartlett is a Republican. Nice try. ~

Chalupah 300 October 18, 2007 09:07AM

Since when? n/t

Death_Claw 370 October 18, 2007 02:45PM

You're right. For some reason I misread his other article.

Death_Claw 334 October 18, 2007 02:49PM

VAT and accounting

DurNominator 345 October 18, 2007 11:03AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 145
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 230 May 02, 2024