Re: Honestly. Solo ranking = better skills is a myth.

January 29, 2009 06:08PM
Plus, I recall immortals saying they added a bonus to learning rates while in a group. The race thing will definitly boost your morale. I think grouping with similar alignments helps with this as well though my studies on morale and its affects haven't quite become that in depth yet. Not only good + good but chaotic + chaotic. Etc. etc.

Supposedly the group bonus its still not QUITE as good as solo ranking. But a human warrior I had recently learned a hell of a lot slower solo than my storm giant warrior in a group. (usually of elves, stormies, and various goodies)
Subject Author Posted

Regarding the need to practice

Mek January 29, 2009 10:47AM

I prefer it as is, and here's why

daurwyn(VIP) January 31, 2009 02:20AM

Or each level gives 1% gain.

The Forsaken(VIP) January 30, 2009 08:59AM

And to add...

The Forsaken(VIP) January 30, 2009 09:01AM

Yeah I think this is a great idea, too. n/t

Balrahd(VIP) January 30, 2009 09:23AM

Me too.

Mek January 31, 2009 08:42AM

It is intelligent design.

smfii January 30, 2009 03:41AM

That's exactly why World of Warcraft, and other games, suck. NT

Batman January 30, 2009 04:11AM

Yeah. That + lower risk. I want ramifications if I fuck up nt

istirith January 30, 2009 06:11PM

Agreed. NT

Matrik January 30, 2009 11:07AM

The more posts like this I read, the more I think all defense skill %s should just be a flat 100%.

Balrahd(VIP) January 29, 2009 11:04PM

Thing is 100's do mater....

lightmage February 01, 2009 08:01AM

The vine's gone now :(

istirith February 01, 2009 08:28AM

Let's have built in preps for mages too, and all warriors have saved weapons.

Rogue January 30, 2009 02:40AM

I was being serious. I don't think setting defenses at 100% will as much of an impact as the other stuff you listed.

Balrahd(VIP) January 30, 2009 07:49AM

Re: I was being serious. I don't think setting defenses at 100% will as much of an impact as the other stuff you listed.

Rogue January 30, 2009 11:31AM

Re: I was being serious. I don't think setting defenses at 100% will as much of an impact as the other stuff you listed.

Balrahd(VIP) January 30, 2009 08:24PM

Yeah, yeah I read what you said the first time, still not gettin it.

Rogue January 31, 2009 02:21AM

Just a small clarification on my approach to playing

Mek January 31, 2009 12:49AM

Re: I was being serious. I don't think setting defenses at 100% will as much of an impact as the other stuff you listed.

Isildur(VIP) January 30, 2009 03:45PM

I don't think it would matter. txt

Isildur(VIP) January 30, 2009 08:39AM

IMO non-defense skills should still have to be spammed.

Balrahd(VIP) January 30, 2009 09:27AM

Well, the other way around this is to show neither %s, nor improvement messages~

ExPaladin(VIP) January 30, 2009 03:15AM

More then 100%

ekvilibr January 29, 2009 11:08PM

Plan you character

ekvilibr January 29, 2009 10:47PM

Ok, enough with the slippery slope crap

Mek January 29, 2009 10:53PM

Just do not play dumb races then

ekvilibr January 29, 2009 10:59PM

I really don't

Mek January 29, 2009 11:30PM

There are other things to worry about besides skill percentages that fuck up your 'luck of the draw' game way more.

Scrimbul January 30, 2009 08:02AM

Hey man I *DO* realize all of that, hence...

Mek January 30, 2009 08:29AM

I have better solution

dervish January 29, 2009 08:58PM

I wouldn't call them lazy, BUT

deriveh January 29, 2009 11:06PM

Okay then

dervish January 29, 2009 11:33PM

Re: I wouldn't call them lazy, BUT

ekvilibr January 29, 2009 11:12PM

That is a good idea actually. :D n/t

deriveh January 30, 2009 02:24AM

It wouldn't ruin a thing

Mek January 29, 2009 10:31PM

What annoys me.

cointreau January 29, 2009 03:07PM

I wouldn't even bother on parry/dodge/shield block.

istirith January 29, 2009 03:15PM

Only problem with that...

AncientNewbie January 29, 2009 04:28PM

Honestly. Solo ranking = better skills is a myth.

Pro January 29, 2009 05:18PM

Re: Honestly. Solo ranking = better skills is a myth.

Matrik January 29, 2009 06:08PM

That's pretty much my experience.

Pro January 30, 2009 06:37AM

Are you implying that three of the same race provides a ranking bonus even for non-orcs?

Jib January 29, 2009 06:01PM

Three felar, at least, get a really noticable increase. I've never had any other same race group.~

ibuki January 29, 2009 06:37PM

Fuck aim.

cointreau January 29, 2009 03:59PM

Re: Regarding the need to practice

qurdind January 29, 2009 12:31PM

My god, shut up already. FFS.

Scrimbul January 29, 2009 12:29PM

Our priorities must vary considerably

Mek January 29, 2009 03:46PM

It's not that bad

asthiss January 29, 2009 09:17PM

Sorry man, but...

Mek January 29, 2009 10:37PM

I can kill your level 15 dex race, and probably your level 25 and 30 one, with an orc or a giant or a duergar.

Scrimbul January 29, 2009 11:08PM

Agreed

cyril January 29, 2009 10:51AM

Except one of the original reasons for the change was to benefit higher int chars nt.

laearrist January 29, 2009 12:05PM

The game landscape has changed

Mek January 29, 2009 04:41PM

No child left behind! nt

Artificial January 29, 2009 07:33PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 122
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024