On the good side, seems you got nice forms ; ) . nt.

paradox

November 26, 2011 07:13AM

Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 17

Nt.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
Getting a bit pissed at the RNG	abernyte	November 26, 2011 03:38AM
Thats what you get for playing a lamo shifter instead of a rager (n/t)	thinhallen	November 26, 2011 08:19AM
For whatever reason, rager just aint happening for me, I did try. (n/t)	abernyte	November 26, 2011 02:42PM
Yeah, I don't like easy mode, either. (n/t)	TaterPig	November 26, 2011 04:00PM
Misinfo. (n/t)	alansmithee	November 27, 2011 10:28AM
Disinfo. (n/t)	RobDarken	November 28, 2011 07:16PM
so why do so many ragers con die? (n/t)	Graham	November 27, 2011 12:13AM
See Artificial's post below.	TaterPig	November 27, 2011 05:51AM
How is Giant Sword not easy mode? How is human necro not easy mode? How is felar assassin not easy mode.	Sam	November 28, 2011 12:41PM
You are a serial rager player and your opinion doesn't count. (n/t)	TaterPig	November 28, 2011 12:58PM
I've played 4 ragers out of ~18 heroes. I've had just as many Nexuns as ragers :)	Sam	November 28, 2011 02:46PM
I'm not up on current affairs, who have your ragers been? (n/t)	Graham	November 27, 2011 11:19AM
I don't mind being called out. I don't have any.	TaterPig	November 27, 2011 01:58PM
This statement is the epitome of what I'm talking about..	thinhallen	November 27, 2011 08:15PM
No. I don't have to because I'm right.	TaterPig	November 28, 2011 01:30AM
Yep, glad you came to this argument. #rehashsameoldtiredshit	Sam	November 28, 2011 12:42PM
Fake posts. (n/t)	alansmithee	November 28, 2011 07:13AM
Sounds like you just suck. You do know there are these things called return/recall potions, right?	Frosty	November 28, 2011 05:31AM
Bullshit.	TaterPig	November 28, 2011 12:56PM
Your groups fucking suck dude. NT	Sam	November 28, 2011 02:45PM
Typically, yes they do. (n/t)	TaterPig	November 29, 2011 01:48AM
Wassamatta u? (n/t)	Frosty	November 27, 2011 03:27PM
Are you just logical fallacy trolling? (n/t)	Artificial	November 27, 2011 11:26AM
I think it's important that people who vehemently support this line of thinking back it up with some sort of credibility ie a successful "easy mode" berserker which they played (n/t)	thinhallen	November 27, 2011 11:41AM
OF COURSE, THIS MAKES PERFECT SENSE	vortexmagus	November 27, 2011 03:57PM
CAPITALIZING ROXORZ	thinhallen	November 27, 2011 07:45PM
Anyone who has played for a while knows...	Death_Claw	December 01, 2011 06:59AM
Vice versa holds true as well..	thinhallen	December 01, 2011 01:05PM
He's just poking at the silliness of the argument of "IF YOU DON'T DO IT/ARE NOT IT, YOU CAN'T CRITICIZE!" nt	Batman	November 28, 2011 04:10AM
Well, if you are going to call something "easy mode" doesn't it make sense to actually know just how easy or not it is?	ExPaladin(VIP)	November 28, 2011 04:18AM
I suppose I was taking "easy mode" to be more of a sarcastic way of saying "little investment" - You're right. Nothing in CF is easy mode.	Batman	November 28, 2011 05:39AM
Saying calling resist is easier than gathering preps is a tautology, so I assumed the meaning was being used broader than that (n/t)	ExPaladin(VIP)	November 28, 2011 06:33AM
I thought this argument was about "easy mode," not about what's "overpoowered." (n/t)	wrathpuppet	November 27, 2011 04:14PM
Real post. (n/t)	alansmithee	November 27, 2011 12:08PM
Sad to see you go. (n/t)	RobDarken	November 28, 2011 07:16PM
And yet only one subset of one cabal elicits this sort of response regularly.	Coumidin	November 27, 2011 12:04PM
No, you instead see.	Graham	November 29, 2011 10:00AM
Having played an incredibly unhealthy amount of ragers...	thinhallen	November 27, 2011 01:02PM
Re: prepping	Coumidin	November 27, 2011 04:02PM
Sorry wasn't clear there..	thinhallen	November 27, 2011 08:04PM
So, in short....	TaterPig	November 28, 2011 01:32AM
I've played a ton of ragers so to me it's easy and has that comfort factor as well (n/t)	thinhallen	November 29, 2011 02:53AM
Please repost this as a new thread. You make a damn good point here that I think is overlooked.	Frosty	November 27, 2011 03:36PM
That would be me. And Thin is, of course, right. (n/t)	alansmithee	November 28, 2011 07:15AM
Batman and Robdarken say the same thing, having played ragers. My next will be a rager. (n/t)	Artificial	November 27, 2011 03:25PM
Awesome, I respect that. I'd like to see if your view shifts after.	thinhallen	November 27, 2011 07:47PM
Because they're played by newbies. (n/t)	RobDarken	November 27, 2011 04:23AM
I really hate this non sequitur	Artificial	November 27, 2011 12:26AM
Misinfo. (n/t)	alansmithee	November 27, 2011 10:27AM
Misinfo (n/t)	Artificial	November 27, 2011 10:29AM
Info HIT! (n/t)	TaterPig	November 27, 2011 11:01AM
You sank my Ministry of Truth! (n/t)	Artificial	November 27, 2011 11:04AM
Re: I really hate this non sequitur	Graham	November 27, 2011 01:38AM
Re: I really hate this non sequitur	Isildur(VIP)	November 27, 2011 07:20AM
Re: I really hate this non sequitur	ThreeTimes	November 27, 2011 02:36AM
On the good side, seems you got nice forms ; ) . nt.	paradox	November 26, 2011 07:13AM
I've checked 220 locations until I found my sleeks with good major and not really good minor forms.	danilevski	November 26, 2011 04:49AM
iknowthatfeelbro.jpg (n/t)	Artificial	November 26, 2011 08:51PM
Just curious if you know that there are not that many wand locations. (n/t)	Matrik	November 26, 2011 06:17AM
Summary shield+aura+barrier locations gives FAR more than that. (n/t)	danilevski	November 26, 2011 09:15AM
Not sleek ones. (n/t)	vortexmagus	November 26, 2011 09:24AM
Or maybe you just don't know some spots. (n/t)	danilevski	November 26, 2011 10:56AM
Nope. Definitely less than 100 spots. (n/t)	Matrik	November 26, 2011 01:33PM
There are about 30 of each in total +- a few. Not all availible to all due to align/ethos restrictions. (n/t)	deriveh	November 26, 2011 01:26PM
Imms have said there are less than 100 spots.~	ibuki	November 26, 2011 01:13PM
I wouldn't bet on this	danilevski	November 26, 2011 09:42PM
We have an official answer on this:	danilevski	November 27, 2011 06:49AM
You don't have to have them all on your own mage. Help allied mages look for their spots, and you'll learn lots of locations in the lifetime of one character.~	ibuki	November 27, 2011 07:08AM
Thats how I've got 200+ locations, lol	danilevski	November 27, 2011 07:20AM
Allies don't always tell the truth	daurwyn(VIP)	November 27, 2011 08:37AM
Not saying it's bad rp, but I'm pretty meh on this if you're doing it to noobs.	bell	November 27, 2011 09:32AM
Nah, it's more if	daurwyn(VIP)	November 27, 2011 01:16PM
LOL @ you checking 200 locations, half of which actually ever spawn a sleek. (n/t)	DurNominator(VIP)	November 27, 2011 08:09AM
Usually I find it a loooooooooooooot earlier, I've checked 200+ locations only once, actually :) (n/t)	danilevski	November 27, 2011 09:27AM
In any case, I had a good laugh when thinking about it.	DurNominator(VIP)	November 27, 2011 09:33AM
It gave me about 40k observe exp grand total ;)	danilevski	November 27, 2011 09:42AM
This is where detect artifact really helps.	Frosty	November 27, 2011 03:18PM
If you want your sleeks on pre-40 levels, you have to find it yourself.	danilevski	November 27, 2011 07:58PM
"and OOC sharing sleek locations isn't a thing many would do"	Matrik	November 27, 2011 06:15AM
Matrik, did you forget to send me the updated super secret wand location cheat list? I didn't see it in my PMs. Resend, pls? (n/t)	satchmo	November 27, 2011 06:23AM
If that's the case, the sleek system is as messed up as people think.	Coumidin	November 26, 2011 11:27AM
Not even close to that, even. (n/t)	sevriis	November 26, 2011 06:26AM
I guess I could wait until I have detect artefact but it means not being competative in the mid ranks, dull! Yet another spam to hero shifter :P (n/t)	abernyte	November 26, 2011 05:42AM

Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 100

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken