I think the best compromise is to keep lore but make it level one. (n/t)

Dalbrin

May 05, 2013 04:02PM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 962

This message does not contain any text.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
Alright: Topic Change! Why SHOULDN'T the lore skill just come in at 100% on all chars with it?	satchmo	May 04, 2013 05:21PM
You need to look at objects to get good at determining their value.	vladamir	May 06, 2013 03:04AM
Is this fun?	JimmyDean	May 06, 2013 05:19PM
That's the key I think.	Matrik	May 06, 2013 05:24PM
If it ruins your experience I'm all for it. It's easy to master. (n/t)	Pro	May 06, 2013 05:20PM
You know what's not easy for you to master? Basic reading comprehension.	JimmyDean	May 06, 2013 05:24PM
Spamming lore works better using many different items	Dalbrin	May 06, 2013 04:56PM
Nope. Stack +Mana goods pick an item and lore your arse off. (n/t)	Pro	May 06, 2013 05:22PM
Good try, now try again without the retarded realism	Scrimbul	May 06, 2013 11:40AM
Why it's a 'duh' move	JimmyDean	May 06, 2013 01:40AM
Thinking about it	daurwyn(VIP)	May 05, 2013 11:17PM
see my point about making game easier, not more complex.	satchmo	May 06, 2013 01:20PM
I think the best compromise is to keep lore but make it level one. (n/t)	Dalbrin	May 05, 2013 04:02PM
Re: Alright: Topic Change! Why SHOULDN'T the lore skill just come in at 100% on all chars with it?	dan83	May 05, 2013 11:09AM
This sells me. I'm going to go post on the officials. Which is rare for me! Hope I can be patient for Santa Zulg, but I'm gonna sound them out now. (n/t)	satchmo	May 05, 2013 11:43AM
I say get rid of lore for most characters (exc. being bard, gnomes), and have a few shops that specialize in identification. (n/t)	TaterPig	May 05, 2013 02:19AM
No, but see: that's the point...	satchmo	May 05, 2013 05:38AM
I'm just a bigger fan of realism than "gaminess"	TaterPig	May 05, 2013 10:00AM
Some sort of class specific lore could be neat.	Matrik	May 05, 2013 10:16AM
That's actually really cool. But I'm trying to think: Make game simpler, not more complex.	satchmo	May 05, 2013 11:47AM
I could get on board with that.	TaterPig	May 05, 2013 10:18AM
Also hide, sneak and camo (n/t)	ekvilibr	May 04, 2013 10:58PM
I'm neutral re this	daurwyn(VIP)	May 04, 2013 10:47PM
The irony about lore, from a gameplay perspective, is that those who need it most (newbies), don't get much use out if it, and those who don't need it (as much) will have it perfected.	Jib	May 04, 2013 06:49PM
I'm also a fan of maybe putting it at lvl 1, instead of like...what, 18 or so? (n/t)	satchmo	May 04, 2013 06:56PM
To be fair though.	Matrik	May 04, 2013 07:00PM
No I totally agree. But if lore is going to be kept as a skill at all, just go ahead and newb friendly it.	satchmo	May 04, 2013 07:04PM
Yeah, like I said. Don't see any reason not to. (n/t)	Matrik	May 04, 2013 08:36PM
How about deny all classes except bard. Problem solved (n/t)	Demtok	May 04, 2013 06:45PM
I never had a problem with it after they added lore skill increases from exploring/observing/examining items ect. (n/t)	Frosty	May 04, 2013 05:26PM
but that's skill learns you could use on something else. Why not just have it at 100, like recall?	satchmo	May 04, 2013 05:30PM
I'm not talking about skill learns, I'm talking about discusing with your guildmasters. (n/t)	Frosty	May 04, 2013 05:42PM
edit: would you cry tomorrow if it WAS 100% automatically?	satchmo	May 04, 2013 06:19PM
Re: edit: would you cry tomorrow if it WAS 100% automatically?	Frosty	May 04, 2013 06:35PM
It's cool, Frosty. See Jib's comment, it makes me realize I think lore should be a lvl 1 skill. (n/t)	satchmo	May 04, 2013 06:56PM
I'll definitely agree putting it at lvl 1 would be the best route.	Frosty	May 04, 2013 07:07PM
Agreed, should be 100% for everyone.	Matrik	May 04, 2013 05:35PM

Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Xyfa

Guests: 33

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken