irrelevant to discussion

July 08, 2008 07:43PM
entwine fails against someone whose going to be outdamaging you and can simply blind you to fuck your primary wield - entwining 1v1 works only when you are gonna win regardless, not when you are going to give him 3+ rounds to outmelee the crap out of you. Yeah, there are ways to cover the vulnerability entwine gives you, like balance or maelstrom, but then you'll be at even more of a disadvantage since you had to spend one of your precious legacies just to cover it.

Yeah, there are counter tactics to cover your strat, but then I can counter your counters, etc ad infinitum. No legacies, no uberspecial sets, or cabal abilities involved, an stsf dagger spec will tool any dwarf who attempts to entwine/flurry. After all the rest is factored in, it depends more on situation, but a dwarf entwine flurry spec will always be at a certain disadvantage, since he requires legacies + equipment + preps to cover his weaknesses, while stsf can use those things to gain a bigger edge over him.
Subject Author Views Posted

As it was requested, Kanjiro vs Hect

LogFiend 929 July 07, 2008 07:10PM

Hamstring > Rager (nt)

cointreau 367 July 08, 2008 12:33AM

9 rounds = 2 hits, deleting my 1 rank dwarf now! nt

zanzarin 317 July 07, 2008 10:51PM

Entwine+flurry owns unprepped dex warriors.

Engurd 419 July 08, 2008 12:54AM

Don't entwine. Keep it simple: Flurry after he hamstrings. If it doesn't work, run after flurry lag. nt

Drokk 292 July 08, 2008 11:24PM

Good point too. Or bash, bash, fluuuurrrry! -nt

Engurd 310 July 09, 2008 08:41AM

And entwine 23-25 dex war and land more then 5 hits flurry as dwarf is a big big problem. Nice joke! nt

zanzarin 360 July 08, 2008 01:02AM

Entwine is not dex based i believe, from my experience. Someone else here mentioned it too, i just do not remember who.

Engurd 387 July 08, 2008 01:23AM

you misinterpret his words

vortexmagus 451 July 08, 2008 10:26AM

You're completely wrong about some things.

Sam 357 July 08, 2008 02:09PM

well, I love you, but you're making assumptions here

vortexmagus 471 July 08, 2008 06:32PM

Oh hey, yeah. It was just a small point I disagreed with heh.

Sam 355 July 08, 2008 07:30PM

Nice theory. May i know when you played your last whip/sword dwarf? Or even not a dwarf. -nt

Engurd 312 July 08, 2008 12:53PM

irrelevant to discussion

vortexmagus 464 July 08, 2008 07:43PM

Heh, check this (Tirka is an arial): http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/read.php?3,633644 ,633644#msg-633644 -nt

Engurd 547 July 09, 2008 08:35AM

Are you on crack?

vortexmagus 457 July 09, 2008 04:57PM

I think Humbert was doing well enough against Kostyan either

Engurd 443 July 10, 2008 04:42AM

Whats your point with this log? nt.

aussie13 302 July 09, 2008 11:47AM

Same point as you can see in this log: http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/read.php?3,63 2667,632667#msg-632667

Engurd 309 July 10, 2008 04:22AM

Who cares? It's not like all of your characters haven't sucked.

Krilcov 369 July 08, 2008 03:15PM

I should probably just avoid talking with you, as every of your posts are senseless rant.

Engurd 306 July 08, 2008 06:00PM

Or... you know...

Krilcov 311 July 08, 2008 09:38PM

Ya, I got worked hard. Just annoyed having two pincers avoided, the rest miss, and having ....

aussie13 384 July 07, 2008 10:39PM

There few factors that can't be left unnoticed

Engurd 440 July 08, 2008 12:48AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 30
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024