it is about worthless without decent size advantage despite skill nt

Zheeser

March 11, 2010 11:15AM

Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 1,280

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
Lowbie warrior rematch! Death included!	LogFiend	603	March 09, 2010 09:13AM
Distance is purely skill based...	_Magus_	386	March 09, 2010 01:16PM
it is about worthless without decent size advantage despite skill nt	Zheeser	217	March 11, 2010 11:15AM
Agree to disagree. ~	_Magus_	235	March 11, 2010 12:14PM
No. n/t	jalim	194	March 09, 2010 05:44PM
Hardly 'purely' skill based. Its mainly size based. Noticeably. (n/t)	BattleCharmed	223	March 09, 2010 02:25PM
Has anyone crunched the effect of 'target weapon size' and distance? NT	Quixotic	210	March 10, 2010 06:55AM
Where's Hastur when you need him? (n/t)	PaulO	218	March 10, 2010 10:32AM
I do miss him, valid with his info and not one stray away from doing some homework. ingame or on paper nt	Krilcov	244	March 10, 2010 01:44PM
That's why I edited my post. Apparently you didn't take the time to read it?	_Magus_	231	March 09, 2010 06:01PM
Which is wrong. My fire Pole Spec had good Distancing ability at 80% (n/t)	BattleCharmed	257	March 10, 2010 02:46AM
I think you're lying. Doesn't match my experience. ~	_Magus_	231	March 10, 2010 07:52AM
Pro. n/t	jalim	214	March 10, 2010 11:50AM
Why would I lie?	BattleCharmed	311	March 10, 2010 11:39AM
If I hadn't already played a successful gnome and svirf polearm specialist, I might actually believe your speculation. ~	_Magus_	209	March 10, 2010 12:16PM
Just cause you suck at pk doesn't mean your statement is true	Thom	286	March 12, 2010 10:48AM
Yeah, you're right...I suck at PK. ~	_Magus_	181	March 13, 2010 08:18AM
Having played a Svirf and Fire pole spec. I feel my speculation is correct. (n/t)	BattleCharmed	205	March 10, 2010 12:56PM
Svirf distance 100% > Fire Giant distance 75%	_Magus_	221	March 10, 2010 03:10PM
We were talking about Distance, not defensive abilities. (n/t)	BattleCharmed	217	March 11, 2010 12:08PM
The majority of my post is about distance. Nice reading comprehension by the way. ~	_Magus_	226	March 11, 2010 12:13PM
Didn't you bring up defensive capabilities in the last post? Fail.com n/t	jmc	215	March 11, 2010 12:27PM
You see that little word in there..."majority"	_Magus_	258	March 11, 2010 12:40PM
Hard to definitely state that I think	jmc	290	March 11, 2010 02:31PM
I feel you both are talking about poles too much. (n/t)	Scrimbul	196	March 10, 2010 01:46PM
One can NEVER talk about poles enough ;) n/t	Stevers	197	March 10, 2010 01:48PM
Did you have shadows? Was it pre-edge?	jmc	241	March 10, 2010 12:49PM
Cosign. nt	Krilcov	189	March 09, 2010 04:53PM
Size differential I thought...ie reduced gnome should rock enlarged giant (n/t)	shane	334	March 09, 2010 05:01PM
Its not just the size differential. Its the strength value as well. (n/t)	BattleCharmed	240	March 10, 2010 11:40AM
It isn't size differential at all. Bigger = better, period. A reduced svirf will always suck at distance. Yes, even when fighting an enlarged Stay Puft marshmallow man. nt	Java	267	March 11, 2010 03:09AM
I hate when people just flat out lie about stuff. nt	Java	206	March 10, 2010 03:43AM
Incorrect, bigger distances better against smaller foes. n/t	bored	228	March 09, 2010 05:31PM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 76

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 172 April 28, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken