I say no..it isn't ok. Even if he isn't a berserker. nt

minyar

October 15, 2010 11:50AM

Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 495

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
AP and villager against mage, is this okay villager RP?	LogFiend	799	October 14, 2010 02:52PM
Its perfectly ok. Its a mage. To ragers, all mages need to be eradicated.	BattleCharmed	273	October 15, 2010 06:42PM
What if the villager waits till his enemy warrior gets attacked by a mage and then jumps against a warrior as well? (n/t)	dervish	314	October 15, 2010 06:48PM
A warrior is not a mage which makes your point moot. (n/t)	BattleCharmed	254	October 16, 2010 08:51AM
It is ok to attack a mage fighting an NPC or group of NPCs,	Quixotic	250	October 16, 2010 03:34AM
Yes, it is ok (n/t)	Matrik	253	October 15, 2010 01:09PM
I say no..it isn't ok. Even if he isn't a berserker. nt	minyar	304	October 15, 2010 11:50AM
Why should he let that mage live? (n/t)	cenatar	308	October 15, 2010 12:18PM
If the villager heard the polar bear being attacked and spelled up, it was VERY bad	trewyn	327	October 15, 2010 02:32PM
i don't think he could harm the anti-paladin.	joe	261	October 15, 2010 04:32PM
That sounds pretty bad to me. I personally think that's a pretty crappy reason to do it. nt	trewyn	243	October 15, 2010 05:37PM
only if you think about it. nt	joe	208	October 16, 2010 07:04AM
Also... what kind of sissified villager willfully accepts help from a low down stinkin' worthless mage? nt	trewyn	231	October 15, 2010 02:36PM
a villagers sees 2 mages in a room runs in and attacks them...	Quas	278	October 15, 2010 09:58AM
Uh, no, the village is about parity	jmc	295	October 15, 2010 10:05AM
um no the village is not about parity	Quas	347	October 15, 2010 10:17AM
Tablet specifically mentions parity	jmc	280	October 15, 2010 10:26AM
Village Tablet/Tapestry is just like Paladin Code and up for interpretation, so people will be dickish and argue about both indefinetly. n/t	jalim	295	October 15, 2010 10:44AM
seems fine to me, mage gotta die and as long as its not 2 villagers seems ok. nt	alexos	314	October 15, 2010 07:20AM
Looks fine to me (n/t)	Moligant	233	October 15, 2010 05:05AM
Soooo....	sleepy	289	October 15, 2010 05:04AM
NVM, looks like you didnt post the full log. (n/t)	sleepy	231	October 15, 2010 05:09AM
Ragers are not knights	cenatar	299	October 15, 2010 12:29AM
Villagers now have no RP, they have only BLOODTHRIST! :) nt	zanzarin	249	October 14, 2010 08:19PM
So nothing has changed then. (n/t)	Artificial	241	October 14, 2010 09:47PM
I'm okay with it	wrathpuppet	331	October 14, 2010 05:30PM
What did he do wrong? don't be buthurt for trying to get a cheap charge and failing nt (n/t)	subov	211	October 14, 2010 03:20PM
Depends	jmc	348	October 14, 2010 03:18PM
I think the villager is scout.	DurNominator(VIP)	315	October 15, 2010 06:21AM
I just thought he was out of the pk range n/t	jmc	243	October 15, 2010 07:34AM
My experience is parity is only looked for with other non-mages. (n/t)	Welverin	231	October 14, 2010 03:40PM
Parity applies to all except very powerful magi like Liches and AP's with big weapons nt.	minyar	247	October 15, 2010 11:57AM
Possibly. He can even make the argument that the AP interfered in HIS battle n/t	jmc	238	October 14, 2010 05:17PM
Yeah. That's what it would've looked like to me since no one saw the summon except the two mages. nt	trewyn	246	October 14, 2010 05:35PM
That's what I though too	sleepy	252	October 15, 2010 05:29AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 32

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken