What if the villager waits till his enemy warrior gets attacked by a mage and then jumps against a warrior as well? (n/t)

dervish

October 15, 2010 06:48PM

Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 2,108

This message does not contain any text.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Views	Posted
AP and villager against mage, is this okay villager RP?	LogFiend	794	October 14, 2010 02:52PM
Its perfectly ok. Its a mage. To ragers, all mages need to be eradicated.	BattleCharmed	270	October 15, 2010 06:42PM
What if the villager waits till his enemy warrior gets attacked by a mage and then jumps against a warrior as well? (n/t)	dervish	309	October 15, 2010 06:48PM
A warrior is not a mage which makes your point moot. (n/t)	BattleCharmed	251	October 16, 2010 08:51AM
It is ok to attack a mage fighting an NPC or group of NPCs,	Quixotic	247	October 16, 2010 03:34AM
Yes, it is ok (n/t)	Matrik	250	October 15, 2010 01:09PM
I say no..it isn't ok. Even if he isn't a berserker. nt	minyar	301	October 15, 2010 11:50AM
Why should he let that mage live? (n/t)	cenatar	305	October 15, 2010 12:18PM
If the villager heard the polar bear being attacked and spelled up, it was VERY bad	trewyn	324	October 15, 2010 02:32PM
i don't think he could harm the anti-paladin.	joe	258	October 15, 2010 04:32PM
That sounds pretty bad to me. I personally think that's a pretty crappy reason to do it. nt	trewyn	240	October 15, 2010 05:37PM
only if you think about it. nt	joe	205	October 16, 2010 07:04AM
Also... what kind of sissified villager willfully accepts help from a low down stinkin' worthless mage? nt	trewyn	228	October 15, 2010 02:36PM
a villagers sees 2 mages in a room runs in and attacks them...	Quas	275	October 15, 2010 09:58AM
Uh, no, the village is about parity	jmc	292	October 15, 2010 10:05AM
um no the village is not about parity	Quas	344	October 15, 2010 10:17AM
Tablet specifically mentions parity	jmc	278	October 15, 2010 10:26AM
Village Tablet/Tapestry is just like Paladin Code and up for interpretation, so people will be dickish and argue about both indefinetly. n/t	jalim	292	October 15, 2010 10:44AM
seems fine to me, mage gotta die and as long as its not 2 villagers seems ok. nt	alexos	311	October 15, 2010 07:20AM
Looks fine to me (n/t)	Moligant	230	October 15, 2010 05:05AM
Soooo....	sleepy	286	October 15, 2010 05:04AM
NVM, looks like you didnt post the full log. (n/t)	sleepy	228	October 15, 2010 05:09AM
Ragers are not knights	cenatar	296	October 15, 2010 12:29AM
Villagers now have no RP, they have only BLOODTHRIST! :) nt	zanzarin	246	October 14, 2010 08:19PM
So nothing has changed then. (n/t)	Artificial	238	October 14, 2010 09:47PM
I'm okay with it	wrathpuppet	328	October 14, 2010 05:30PM
What did he do wrong? don't be buthurt for trying to get a cheap charge and failing nt (n/t)	subov	208	October 14, 2010 03:20PM
Depends	jmc	345	October 14, 2010 03:18PM
I think the villager is scout.	DurNominator(VIP)	312	October 15, 2010 06:21AM
I just thought he was out of the pk range n/t	jmc	240	October 15, 2010 07:34AM
My experience is parity is only looked for with other non-mages. (n/t)	Welverin	228	October 14, 2010 03:40PM
Parity applies to all except very powerful magi like Liches and AP's with big weapons nt.	minyar	244	October 15, 2010 11:57AM
Possibly. He can even make the argument that the AP interfered in HIS battle n/t	jmc	235	October 14, 2010 05:17PM
Yeah. That's what it would've looked like to me since no one saw the summon except the two mages. nt	trewyn	243	October 14, 2010 05:35PM
That's what I though too	sleepy	249	October 15, 2010 05:29AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 141

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 178 May 01, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken